Proprioception in Orthopaedics, Sports Medicine and Rehabilitation 2017
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-66640-2_1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Neurophysiology and Assessment of the Proprioception

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To understand the results of our review, it is important to consider the current understanding of proprioception feedback, arising from both joint mechanoreceptors (providing information regarding internal mechanical forces, muscle length, joint velocity, stiffness, deep pressure, acceleration/deceleration, tensile strain, joint motion, and joint position sense) 48,49 and cutaneous mechanoreceptors (providing information derived from external stimuli [discriminatory touch, pressure, skin movement À slip or flutter, skin stretching, vibration, and textures]). 47 We believe that if proprioceptive input came solely from cutaneous mechanoreceptors, our review could have found positive proprioceptive gains with PJPS and kinesthesia outcomes, as it can be theorized that a passive task does not primarily involve active mechanical tissue deformation surrounding a joint.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To understand the results of our review, it is important to consider the current understanding of proprioception feedback, arising from both joint mechanoreceptors (providing information regarding internal mechanical forces, muscle length, joint velocity, stiffness, deep pressure, acceleration/deceleration, tensile strain, joint motion, and joint position sense) 48,49 and cutaneous mechanoreceptors (providing information derived from external stimuli [discriminatory touch, pressure, skin movement À slip or flutter, skin stretching, vibration, and textures]). 47 We believe that if proprioceptive input came solely from cutaneous mechanoreceptors, our review could have found positive proprioceptive gains with PJPS and kinesthesia outcomes, as it can be theorized that a passive task does not primarily involve active mechanical tissue deformation surrounding a joint.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Subthreshold vibration is a proprioceptive training that can improve the function and sensitivity of mechanoreceptors themselves. Subthreshold vibration could improve the function and sensitivity of mechanoreceptors both neurologically and morphologically[ 51 ]. Subthreshold vibration could improve fatigability by improving neural signals that arise from muscle spindles and other mechanoreceptors[ 52 ].…”
Section: Effect Of Subthreshold Vibration On the Mechanoreceptors The...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Subthreshold vibration as a proprioceptive training can enhance the muscle spindle signals, causing plastic modifications in the central nervous system (CNS), such as improving synaptic network strength and/or normalizing the structure and numbers of networks amid neurons. Consequently, plastic modifications in the cortex occur leading to an enhancement in cortical maps of the body, and cortical representation of the joints[ 51 ].…”
Section: Effect Of Subthreshold Vibration On the Mechanoreceptors The...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Proprioceptive and tactile feedback are indispensable for sensorimotor integration in daily activities of human, especially for control of dexterous movement. For amputees, the muscle spindle, tendon, tactile receptor, and afferent fibers in the muscle of the residual limb are damaged and cannot work normally ( Kaya et al, 2018 ). So proprioceptive substitution helps amputee sense the prosthesis, improves the confidence ( Schiefer et al, 2018 ), and controls the prosthesis better ( Grushko et al, 2020 ; Guémann et al, 2022 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%