2022
DOI: 10.1038/s41398-022-01860-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Neurophysiology in psychosis: The quest for disease biomarkers

Abstract: Psychotic disorders affect 3% of the population at some stage in life, are a leading cause of disability, and impose a great economic burden on society. Major breakthroughs in the genetics of psychosis have not yet been matched by an understanding of its neurobiology. Biomarkers of perception and cognition obtained through non-invasive neurophysiological tools, especially EEG, offer a unique opportunity to gain mechanistic insights. Techniques for measuring neurophysiological markers are inexpensive and ubiqui… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 143 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results of this modelling study support the view that sound intensity modulates ERP amplitudes during the latency range of MMN. This may be interpreted as loudness dependence of sensory ERP components that cause amplitude changes that spill over into the measurement window for MMN, which agrees with converging electrophysiological findings in schizophrenia patients (Hagenmuller et al, 2016; Todd et al, 2008; Wang et al, 2022). Alternatively, this could be interpreted in terms of a recent rensition of the predictive coding framework (Hertäg and Clopath, 2022; Keller and Mrsic-Flogel, 2018), whereby opposite polarity amplitude changes in response to quieter and louder deviant stimuli may be taken to reflect examples of negative (i.e.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The results of this modelling study support the view that sound intensity modulates ERP amplitudes during the latency range of MMN. This may be interpreted as loudness dependence of sensory ERP components that cause amplitude changes that spill over into the measurement window for MMN, which agrees with converging electrophysiological findings in schizophrenia patients (Hagenmuller et al, 2016; Todd et al, 2008; Wang et al, 2022). Alternatively, this could be interpreted in terms of a recent rensition of the predictive coding framework (Hertäg and Clopath, 2022; Keller and Mrsic-Flogel, 2018), whereby opposite polarity amplitude changes in response to quieter and louder deviant stimuli may be taken to reflect examples of negative (i.e.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…The MMN component is conventionally measured from the difference waveform between low-probability deviant and high-probability standard stimulus ERPs evoked by a passive oddball paradigm experiment (Näätänen et al, 2004). Changes in this signal are thought to reflect perceptual processing that can become impaired by underlying neuropathology, providing significant impetus for developing MMN as a clinical biomarker (Koshiyama et al, 2020; Schuelert et al, 2018; Taylor et al, 2017; Wang et al, 2022). However, considerable impediments to these efforts stem from ambiguity concerning the underlying neurophysiology of hypothetical prediction and prediction-error signalling components, and their dissociation from overlapping obligatory components that are sensitive to physical properties of sound (Heilbron and Chait, 2018; May, 2021; May and Tiitinen, 2010; O’Reilly and Conway, 2021; O’Reilly and O’Reilly, 2021).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recordings are performed with a standardized set-up (BrainAmp amplifier, Brain Products, Martinsried, Germany) with 32 scalp electrodes (10/20 system). After resting-state EEG has been recorded with eyes closed for 5 min and open for 5 min, activation EEG is recorded with an auditory stimulus (P300) (76,77) for an additional 18 min.…”
Section: Electroencephalographymentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 34 37 Moreover, the amplitude of the N100 component of the auditory evoked potential (AEP), an EEG signal thought to mainly reflect function in the AC, 38 – 42 is reduced in schizophrenia. 33 , 43 48 In addition, the N100 latency has been shown to be altered in patients with schizophrenia. 49 Studies using functional MRI and position emission tomography report activation of the temporal cortex, 50 , 51 including activation of the HG 8 , 23 , 52 54 and the PT 23 , 50 , 54 , 55 during active AH.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%