Neurophysiology of successful encoding and retrieval of source memory

Cansino, Selene; Trejo-Morales, Patricia

doi:10.3758/cabn.8.1.85

Cited by 35 publications

(32 citation statements)

References 52 publications

(109 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Last, the parietal old/new effect was absent in the rest condition, which is inconsistent with previous findings (Addante et al, 2012;Cansino & Trejo-Morales, 2008;Curran, 2000;Herzmann et al, 2012;Wilding & Rugg, 1996). Methodological differences, such as stimuli (e.g., picture or word) and source judgments (i.e., old/new and source judgments were performed separately or simultaneously), might be responsible for this discrepancy.…”

Section: Limitationscontrasting

confidence: 55%

“…Studies comparing correct and incorrect source trials have consistently shown a more positive amplitude for the correct source, relative to incorrect source trials in the parietal old/ new effect time window supporting the notion that the parietal old/new effect is associated with recollection processing. Moreover, findings on the FN400 old/new effect time window have been inconsistent, with certain studies indicating a comparable amplitude between correct source and incorrect source trials (Mollison & Curran, 2012), and other studies showing a more positive amplitude for correct source relative to incorrect source trials (Addante et al, 2012;Cansino & Trejo-Morales, 2008;Peters & Daum, 2009). This difference could be the result of differences in the source information, such as location or color (Mollison & Curran, 2012).…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 69%

“…Previous studies using source memory tasks compared ERP amplitudes on both correct and incorrect source trials with ERP amplitudes on correct rejection trials to assess the old/ new effects. These studies have shown that both correct source and incorrect source trials exhibited the FN400 old/new effect (i.e., correct source > correct rejection, incorrect source > correct rejection), whereas only correct source trials, but not incorrect source trials, exhibited the parietal old/new effect (i.e., correct source > correct rejection, incorrect source ≈ correct rejection; Addante, Ranganath, & Yonelinas, 2012;Cansino & Trejo-Morales, 2008;Mollison & Curran, 2012;Peters & Daum, 2009).…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Aerobic Exercise During Encoding Impairs Hippocampus-Dependent Memory

Soga

Kamijo

Hayashi³

2017

Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

We investigated how aerobic exercise during encoding affects hippocampus-dependent memory through a source memory task that assessed hippocampus-independent familiarity and hippocampus-dependent recollection processes. Using a within-participants design, young adult participants performed a memory-encoding task while performing a cycling exercise or being seated. The subsequent retrieval phase was conducted while sitting on a chair. We assessed behavioral and event-related brain potential measures of familiarity and recollection processes during the retrieval phase. Results indicated that source accuracy was lower for encoding with exercise than for encoding in the resting condition. Event-related brain potential measures indicated that the parietal old/new effect, which has been linked to recollection processing, was observed in the exercise condition, whereas it was absent in the rest condition, which is indicative of exercise-induced hippocampal activation. These findings suggest that aerobic exercise during encoding impairs hippocampusdependent memory, which may be attributed to inefficient source encoding during aerobic exercise.

show abstract

Section: Limitationscontrasting

confidence: 55%

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 69%

mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Aerobic Exercise During Encoding Impairs Hippocampus-Dependent Memory

Soga

Kamijo

Hayashi³

2017

Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…ERPs and other forms of neuroimaging (e.g., fMRI) have been used to compare the recruitment of cognitive and neural resources at encoding and retrieval in long-term-memory tasks, often using the subsequent-memory paradigm (e.g., Cansino & Trejo-Morales, 2008). In this paradigm, researchers record brain activity during a memory-encoding phase and use it to predict subsequent success or failure during a retrieval phase.…”

Section: Pupil Dilation In Long-term Encoding and Retrievalmentioning

confidence: 99%

Pupil Dilation Reflects the Creation and Retrieval of Memories

Goldinger

Papesh

2012

Curr Dir Psychol Sci

226

154

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

It has long been known that pupils—the apertures that allow light into the eyes—dilate and constrict not only in response to changes in ambient light but also in response to emotional changes and arousing stimuli (e.g., Fontana, 1765). Charles Darwin (1872) related changes in pupil diameter to fear and other “emotions” in animals. For decades, pupillometry has been used to study cognitive processing across many domains, including perception, language, visual search, and short-term memory. Historically, such studies have examined the pupillary reflex as a correlate of attentional demands imposed by different tasks or stimuli—pupils typically dilate as cognitive demand increases. Because the neural mechanisms responsible for such task-evoked pupillary reflexes (TEPRs) implicate a role for memory processes, recent studies have examined pupillometry as a tool for investigating the cognitive processes underlying the creation of new episodic memories and their later retrieval. Here, we review the historical antecedents of current pupillometric research and discuss several recent studies linking pupillary dilation to the on-line consumption of cognitive resources in long-term-memory tasks. We conclude by discussing the future role of pupillometry in memory research and several methodological considerations that are important when designing pupillometric studies.

show abstract

“…At the same time ERPs and other neuroimaging techniques such as fMRI have been widely used to study episodic memory encoding in long-term memory tasks, often using the subsequent-memory paradigm (e.g., Cansino & Trejo-Morales, 2008). In this paradigm, brain activity is recorded during a memory-encoding phase and uses it to predict subsequent success or failure during a retrieval phase.…”

Section: Objective Methods Hypotheses/predictionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Mechanisms underlying memory enhancement in humans

Granados¹,

Mar²

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Neurophysiology of successful encoding and retrieval of source memory

Cited by 35 publications

References 52 publications

Aerobic Exercise During Encoding Impairs Hippocampus-Dependent Memory

Aerobic Exercise During Encoding Impairs Hippocampus-Dependent Memory

Pupil Dilation Reflects the Creation and Retrieval of Memories

Mechanisms underlying memory enhancement in humans

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About