2012
DOI: 10.1002/cne.23074
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Neuropil distribution in the cerebral cortex differs between humans and chimpanzees

Abstract: Increased connectivity of higher-order association regions in the neocortex has been proposed as a defining feature of human brain evolution. At present, however, there are limited comparative data to examine this claim fully. We tested the hypothesis that the distribution of neuropil across areas of the neocortex of humans differs from that of one of our closest living relatives, the common chimpanzee. The neuropil provides a proxy measure of total connectivity within a local region because it is comprised mo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
87
2
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

5
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 98 publications
(95 citation statements)
references
References 92 publications
5
87
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It is clear from the work of Ribeiro et al [2013] that in the human brain the density of cells decreases as one moves anteriorly in the brain, being at its lowest in the anterior sections. It is also clear that in the human brain the cell density in the frontal polar cortex is particularly sparse [Semendeferi et al, 2010;Spocter et al, 2012]. Thus, it could be that if, for example, cell numbers were available for the prefrontal and temporal cortex, it might turn out that the human remapping factor does not stand out in terms of cells, though it does in terms of tissue.…”
Section: Limitations Of the Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is clear from the work of Ribeiro et al [2013] that in the human brain the density of cells decreases as one moves anteriorly in the brain, being at its lowest in the anterior sections. It is also clear that in the human brain the cell density in the frontal polar cortex is particularly sparse [Semendeferi et al, 2010;Spocter et al, 2012]. Thus, it could be that if, for example, cell numbers were available for the prefrontal and temporal cortex, it might turn out that the human remapping factor does not stand out in terms of cells, though it does in terms of tissue.…”
Section: Limitations Of the Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…But based on previous knowledge, the presence of adult neuron recruitment in other regions except potentially the olfactory bulb is unlikely (Amrein 2015). Volumetric changes are more likely to occur in the neuropil, which makes up the space between cells (Spocter et al 2012). Finally, mammalian brains show high variation in white matter over the lifetime (Marner et al 2003).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Investigating prefrontal and parietal layer III—a locus for pyramidal cell bodies as well as inter- and intrahemispheric connections—has identified fewer pyramidal neurons, spaced further apart in humans relative to chimpanzees and macaques (Semendeferi et al, 2011; Spocter et al, 2012). A greater horizontal spacing difference suggests that the expanded surface area contains more dendrites and axons, suggesting more of an integrative function of these neurons in humans.…”
Section: Cortical Expansion Differences Are Found In Regions Supportimentioning
confidence: 99%