Neuropragmatics

Bischetti, Luca; Frau, Federico; Bambini, Valentina

doi:10.31234/osf.io/pc74k

Cited by 3 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 68 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…For instance, the form of the lexicon generally contains phonology and orthography, but the phonological aspect of the lexicon is preferred in the book, and less attention is paid to orthographical aspect. And it seems that the interface of the mental lexicon mainly refers to the pragmatic aspect of the lexicon in the volume, which is rather controversial since pragmatics is regarded as being rooted in the brain as suggested by the findings in neuropragmatic studies (Bischetti et al., 2022). Meanwhile, the volume does not capture the mental lexicon studies based on more interdisciplinary techniques in terms of lexical representation, acquisition, and processing, such as network science (Borodkin et al., 2016), computational model (Li, 2009), and quantum framework (Bruza et al., 2009).…”

Section: Brief Commentsmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Oxford handbook of the mental lexicon By AnnaPapafragou, John C.Trueswell, Lila R.Gleitman (Eds.), Oxford: Oxford University Press. 2022. 811 pages. ISBN: 9780198845003

Chen,

Peng

2023

Int J App Linguistics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The mental lexicon, known as the representation of words and morphemes in the mind, is a complex research area that draws attention from scholars across multiple disciplines, including linguistics, psychology, philosophy, neuroscience, education, and computational cognitive science. However, due to the interdisciplinary nature of the field and the continuously evolving tools and theories related to the mental lexicon, researchers face obstacles in keeping up with the latest research frameworks and findings.The Oxford Handbook of the Mental Lexicon is such a comprehensive volume to address these challenges. It covers interdisciplinary and updated research issues and consists of 30 chapters written by leading authors from a variety of interdisciplinary backgrounds. Each chapter introduces research issues and presents the author's perspectives on them, highlighting theoretical and methodological advances from various disciplines. The volume also identifies areas of disagreement and inconsistencies, which provide opportunities for further study and inspire researchers to make breakthroughs in the study of the mental lexicon. MAIN CONTENTS OF THE BOOKThe volume is divided into an extensive introduction and three main parts, corresponding to three centered framing questions: what exactly do you know when you know the lexicon in your native language (the representation of the mental lexicon)? How did you come to know it (the acquisition of the mental lexicon)? How do you put that knowledge to use (the processing of the mental lexicon)? Each part begins with issues of form, then moves on to the discussion of meaning, and ends by addressing the interfaces and boundaries of the mental lexicon and other linguistic or nonlinguistic systems.Part I, Representing the Mental Lexicon, introduces the linguistic theories of how the mind represents words and sub-word units at the phonological, morphological, syntactic, and semantic levels. The part includes three subparts: form (Chapters 2-4), meaning (Chapters 5-8), and interfaces and boundaries (Chapters 9-12). Chapter 2 supports a viewpoint of generative phonology that representational units of words are abstract and psychologically real from the evidence of the patterning in morpho-phonological paradigms, language change, sign language linguistics, and

show abstract

Section: Brief Commentsmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Oxford handbook of the mental lexicon By AnnaPapafragou, John C.Trueswell, Lila R.Gleitman (Eds.), Oxford: Oxford University Press. 2022. 811 pages. ISBN: 9780198845003

Chen,

Peng

2023

Int J App Linguistics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Because of the described disturbances in the cognitive-linguistic interaction, CCDs therefore have a clear negative influence on the ability to act appropriately in different communication contexts. Therefore, CCD also constitutes a prototype of acquired "neuropragmatic disorders" (Bambini and Bara, 2012;Cummings, 2014;Bischetti et al, 2022).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Digital participation in traumatic brain injury: scoping review about assessment tools for computer-mediated communication

Büttner-Kunert,

Royko,

Resch

et al. 2023

Front. Commun.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

BackgroundIndividuals with chronic traumatic brain injury (TBI) are often affected by communication disorders which might have an impact on their social participation. Due to possible cognitive and communicative disabilities, as well as impairments of social cognitive skills, individuals with TBI have been observed to exhibit difficulties in maintaining and establishing social relationships, resulting in a greater risk of social isolation. This applies to both in-person as well as computer-mediated communication (CMC), which is considered an integral part of everyday life. Research on digital participation in the TBI population has focused on the possible challenges and barriers, but also on the benefits of CMC for social interactions. Guidelines from professional societies recommend questionnaires and checklists for assessing restrictions of communicative participation (e.g., ASHA, INCOG). However, there is no overview of whether the available instruments can capture digital aspects of participation or social media use in TBI.AimIn this scoping review, following the PRISMA criteria, we aimed to provide an overview over currently available instruments that help assess CMC use as a measure of digital participation in the TBI population.MethodThe databases Web of Science Core Collection, Ovid, PsycInfo and Psyndex were screened for publications between the years 2013 and 2023 with relevant search terms referring to social participation, assessment tools, CMC and the target group, in order to find suitable tools to assess digital participation in individuals with TBI. In a multistage selection process following the PRISMA criteria, the instruments found were examined in terms of items that assess digital participation. The outcome of the review is an overview of the status quo of potentially available instruments that capture aspects of CMC.ResultsFollowing a screening on title/abstract and full-text level, a total of 10 studies could be identified that present assessment tools that evaluate CMC use as a measure of digital participation in the TBI population. Said studies were analyzed and compared in terms of content according to the selected parameters.ConclusionDigital participation is an important aspect of everyday lives for individuals with TBI. Therefore, CMC should be an integral part of rehabilitation. The existing appropriate questionnaires uncovered in the current study should therefore be applied routinely to detect impairments in CMC and digital participation. Overall, however, there is still a great need for research in the field of CMC, both regarding methods for measuring digital participation disorders as well as resources.Systematic Review Registrationhttps://www.germanistik.uni-muenchen.de/forschung/proj_gl/review_participation_tbi.pdf.

show abstract