1995
DOI: 10.1016/0306-4522(94)00374-e
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Neuroprotection by N-methyl-d-aspartate antagonists in focal cerebral ischemia is dependent on continued maintenance dosing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…89 However, continuous perfusion of DM up to 4 hours after ischemic insult was shown to be necessary for maximum efficacy against focal ischemic damage. 42 This finding, and the use of multiple dose treatment paradigms in focal ischemia models, 45,49 also suggest a DM neuroprotective effect on delayed neuronal damage.…”
Section: Preclinical Evidence Of Neuroprotective Properties Of Dmmentioning
confidence: 85%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…89 However, continuous perfusion of DM up to 4 hours after ischemic insult was shown to be necessary for maximum efficacy against focal ischemic damage. 42 This finding, and the use of multiple dose treatment paradigms in focal ischemia models, 45,49 also suggest a DM neuroprotective effect on delayed neuronal damage.…”
Section: Preclinical Evidence Of Neuroprotective Properties Of Dmmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…27 However, attempts to attribute neuroprotective activity of DM purely to NMDA receptor/channel antagonism are complicated by its relatively low-affinity for that complex, 1,2 as well as by inconsistent findings regarding its ability to prevent glutamate neurotoxicity. 25 Moreover, DM has been shown to have a broader spectrum of neuroprotective effects compared with other NMDA receptor/channel antagonists, 89 with a longer therapeutic time window in focal ischemia 42 and an ability to inhibit delayed neuronal death in global ischemia. 41 It is therefore apparent that mechanisms that may include but are not limited to NMDA receptor/channel antagonism contribute to DM's neuroprotective actions.…”
Section: Werling Et Almentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…MK-801 failed to reduce retinal cell damage under our experimental conditions, despite used at low concentrations to allow specific interactions with the NMDA receptor, maintained during all the experiment and under conditions that induced the opening of the receptor associated channel, in experiments carried out in the absence of Mg 2ϩ (not shown). Nevertheless, Steinberg et al [35] showed previously that MK-801 could be effective as a neuroprotector against focal cerebral ischemia if the dose applied was maintained. Earley et al [36] also showed neuroprotective effects of MK-801 against cortical damage induced by cerebral ischemia and, in the retina, Zeevalk and Nicklas [37,38] found protective effects of MK-801 (1 M) against toxicity induced by 30 min-metabolic inhibition.…”
Section: Mk-801 Nitrendipine and Nitro G -W-arginine May Not Be Highmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our finding of lower prevalence of susceptible heterodimers in adult-onset than in childhood-onset Type I diabetes could suggest either the involvement of other loci in the genetic susceptibility of the disease in adults or heterogeneity of environmental determinants by age at onset of the disease. Insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus induced by the antitussive agent dextromethorphan Dear Sir, In animal studies, antagonists of the N-methyl-d-aspartate (NMDA) receptor, which is a subtype of ionotropic glutamate receptors, are neuroprotective in focal cerebral ischaemia and therefore became a hot topic in brain research [1,2]. Dextromethorphan, a widely used antitussive agent, has non-competitive antagonistic effects at the NMDA receptor [3].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%