My colleagues and I read with great interest the article by Livraghi et al., where the authors stated that radiofrequency ablation (RFA) could be considered the treatment of choice for patients with a singe hepatocellular carcinoma Յ 2 cm, even when surgical treatment is possible. 1 We agree with the main conclusion of the authors. As the authors have pointed out, RFA seems to be equivalent to surgery in terms of local disease control and survival. 1 In addition, RFA is generally much less invasive than surgery and is associated with a lower complication rate. 2 It is no longer unusual that RFA can be the treatment of choice for patients with a single small hepatocellular carcinoma nodule. The investigators must be congratulated for their difficult work.However, we have a question concerning the statistical analysis. In the study, multivariate analysis demonstrated that the appearance of one or more new lesions was the only statistically significant factor. However, the appearance of any new lesion is a delayed phenomenon after RFA. We think that prognosis prediction based on a delayed phenomenon would be of little value in treatment planning and survival prediction at the initial stage of interventional management. We would like to know the results of multivariate analysis after exclusion of this factor. After the exclusion, other factors such as operability might become statistically significant as determined by multivariate analysis. Reply:Of course we agree that the appearance of new lesions is a delayed phenomenon after radiofrequency ablation (RFA) or partial resection. We also agree that, being a delayed phenomenon, this factor is of little value in treatment planning and survival prediction. However, even in the presence of adverse prognostic parameters (high alpha-fetoprotein and des-gamma-carboxy prothrombin levels, low grading, and so forth), it is difficult to predict the individual natural history. For instance, our longest survivor presented at the baseline a 3.5-cm infiltrating hepatocellular carcinoma with alpha-fetoprotein level Ͼ 400 ng/mL. The patient, initially treated with percutaneous ethanol injection and subsequently with RFA when new lesions appeared, is currently free of desease after 19 years of follow-up. The result of our multivariate analysis simply means that even though the treatment is successful, the prognosis is dependent to the timing of appearance of new lesions.On the basis of your suggestion, we performed a new multivariate analysis with the exclusion of this factor, but the other factors as operability (0.61 instead of 0.63) remained not significant.
TITO LIVRAGHI
Chronic Genotype 4 Hepatitis C
To the Editor:Kamal and coworkers provide potentially valuable data on the treatment of patients with chronic hepatitis C infected with hepatitis C virus genotype 4. 1 However, several confusing points should be clarified before their interpretations are accepted.1. The abstract states that 358 patients were randomized; in the text, the number is 378.2. The abstract states that 50 ...