1996
DOI: 10.1016/0920-9964(96)85687-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Neuropsychological impairment in first episode and chronic schizophrenic patients

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
18
0
1

Year Published

2002
2002
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
3
18
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In one study the greatest deficits of schizophrenics were reported in visuomotor and attentional functions, whereas only intermediate deficits in cognitive flexibility could be demonstrated (Albus et al 1996). Our study suggests that the former deficit is probably not peculiar to schizophrenia, whereas the latter may in fact be.…”
Section: Cognition In Schizophrenia 447mentioning
confidence: 64%
“…In one study the greatest deficits of schizophrenics were reported in visuomotor and attentional functions, whereas only intermediate deficits in cognitive flexibility could be demonstrated (Albus et al 1996). Our study suggests that the former deficit is probably not peculiar to schizophrenia, whereas the latter may in fact be.…”
Section: Cognition In Schizophrenia 447mentioning
confidence: 64%
“…The profile analyses involved three steps: 1) estimation of the regression equation for all subjects to eliminate the effects of age, gender, IQ and the non‐independence of observations deriving from the same family; 2) formation of the residuals by using the difference between the predicted and the observed scores (as estimated using the regression equation); and 3) standardisation of age‐, gender‐, and IQ‐adjusted values (i.e., residuals) to form z ‐scores using the mean and standard deviation of the control group. Step 3 was outlined initially by Chapman and Chapman [1989] and implemented first by Saykin et al [1991] and subsequently by others [Cannon et al, 1994; Faraone et al, 1995; Albus et al, 1996].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the nature of the susceptibility genes and the traits they transmit are not understood, there are indications that genetic predisposition to schizophrenia may also be expressed as liability to non‐psychotic dysfunctions including cognitive deficits [Kremen et al, 1994; Cannon et al, 2000]. Four lines of enquiry suggest that cognitive impairment reflects a pathophysiological vulnerability to the illness: 1) it is present in first‐episode and unmedicated schizophrenic patients [Saykin et al, 1991, 1994]; 2) it remains relatively stable throughout the course of illness [Nopoulos et al, 1994; Albus et al, 1996; Censits et al, 1997; Rund, 1998]; 3) it predates the onset of psychosis [David et al, 1995; Jones, 1995]; and 4) it is present in an attenuated form in some of the healthy relatives of schizophrenic patients [Kremen et al, 1994; Cornblatt and Obuchowski, 1997; Faraone et al, 1999; Laurent et al, 1999; Byrne et al, 2000]. Nevertheless, the exact nature of the cognitive impairment shown by the relatives is not, as yet, clearly defined.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, Abramczyk and colleagues (1983) also used the card version and reported a significant interaction of group (schizophrenia vs. normal controls) by interference condition (neutral vs. incongruent), with patients showing a larger interference effect than normal controls. In a subsequent study, Albus et al (1996) reported that both first-episode schizophrenia patients and chronic patients with schizophrenia exhibited greater interference than matched controls. A number of other studies using the card version have also reported greater Stroop interference in schizophrenia patients (Brebion, Smith, Gorman, & Amador, 1996;Hanes, Andrewes, Smith, & Pantelis, 1996;McGrath, Scheldt, Welham, & Clair, 1997), although not all have agreed (Purdon, 1998).…”
Section: Card Versionmentioning
confidence: 96%