1995
DOI: 10.1136/jnnp.58.2.174
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Neuropsychological pattern of striatonigral degeneration: comparison with Parkinson's disease and progressive supranuclear palsy.

Abstract: To study the neuropsychological pattern of striatonigral degeneration (SND) (7 Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1995;58: 174-179)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

9
71
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 152 publications
(80 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
9
71
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This test evaluates memory performance both quantitatively and qualitatively, perseverations, intrusions, sensitivity to interference, capacities to initiate semantic and serial clustering, consistency of recall and recognition (Delis et al, 1987). Executive functions were evaluated with the frontal score (Pillon et al, 1995) including the simpli®ed version of the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test (WCST) (Nelson, 1976) and two 1-min verbal¯uency tasks (words beginning with letter`m' and names of animals) (Thuillard and Assal, 1991). Mood was evaluated with the Montgomery and Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) (Montgomery and Asberg, 1979).…”
Section: Neuropsychological Testsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This test evaluates memory performance both quantitatively and qualitatively, perseverations, intrusions, sensitivity to interference, capacities to initiate semantic and serial clustering, consistency of recall and recognition (Delis et al, 1987). Executive functions were evaluated with the frontal score (Pillon et al, 1995) including the simpli®ed version of the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test (WCST) (Nelson, 1976) and two 1-min verbal¯uency tasks (words beginning with letter`m' and names of animals) (Thuillard and Assal, 1991). Mood was evaluated with the Montgomery and Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) (Montgomery and Asberg, 1979).…”
Section: Neuropsychological Testsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…TMT-B has been frequently used as an index of cognitive flexibility or set-shifting, an important aspect of executive attention control (Arbuthnott & Frank, 2000;Horton, 1979;Kortte, Horner, & Windham, 2002;Moll, Oliveira-Souza Rd, Moll, Bramati, & Andreiuolo, 2002). The TMT has been demonstrated to be sensitive to cognitive impairment in a range of agerelated clinical conditions, including Parkinson disease (Goldman, Baty, Buckles, Sahrmann, & Morris, 1998;Pillon et al, 1995), Alzheimer's disease (Chen et al, 2000(Chen et al, , 2001, and other dementias (Hestad, Aukrust, Ellertsen, & Klove, 1996;Heun, Papassotiropoulos, & Jennssen, 1998;Lunn et al, 1991;Paul et al, 2001;Selnes et al, 1991).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MSA-P is the more common manifestation of MSA in Western populations [89, 90]; therefore, cognitive dysfunction in MSA-P had attracted considerable attention, particularly in comparison with PD and/or progressive supranuclear palsy [82,83,84,86,87,88]. MSA-P patients showed significant deficits in the tests previously shown to be sensitive to frontal lobe dysfunction [83, 85, 86, 88].…”
Section: Multiple System Atrophymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although dementia consistent with the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM IV) is an exclusion criterion for the diagnosis of MSA [81], some studies have reported that MSA patients have a cognitive decline when compared with controls [82,83,84,85,86,87,88]. MSA-P is the more common manifestation of MSA in Western populations [89, 90]; therefore, cognitive dysfunction in MSA-P had attracted considerable attention, particularly in comparison with PD and/or progressive supranuclear palsy [82,83,84,86,87,88].…”
Section: Multiple System Atrophymentioning
confidence: 99%