2020
DOI: 10.1101/2020.06.11.146746
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Neuroscience Cloud Analysis As a Service

Abstract: A major goal of computational neuroscience is to develop powerful analysis tools that operate on large datasets. These methods provide an essential toolset to unlock scientific insights from new experiments. Unfortunately, a major obstacle currently impedes progress: while existing analysis methods are frequently shared as open source software, the infrastructure needed to deploy these methods -at scale, reproducibly, cheaply, and quickly -remains totally inaccessible to all but a minority of expert users. As … Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 90 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A key challenge with emerging, computationally-intensive data analysis methods is that the computational infrastructure and expertise necessary to make effective use of these tools is a significant barrier to widespread adoption (52). For example, many labs do not have the resources necessary to train dozens of models in parallel across many GPUs.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A key challenge with emerging, computationally-intensive data analysis methods is that the computational infrastructure and expertise necessary to make effective use of these tools is a significant barrier to widespread adoption (52). For example, many labs do not have the resources necessary to train dozens of models in parallel across many GPUs.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To develop an efficient implementation of BarDensr on the NeuroCAAS cloud platform (Abe et al, 2020), we needed to find the most cost-effective hardware for the job. Using a 1000 × 1000 sized image from the experimental data described in the main text, we ran the model on several different AWS instance types.…”
Section: B Hardware Time and Cost Comparisonsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The method requires about two minutes of compute time on a p2.xlarge Amazon GPU instance to process a seven-round, four-channels 1000 × 1000-pixel field of view from an experiment targeting 79 different transcripts. We also provide an implementation for the NeuroCAAS web-service (Abe et al, 2020), which can be used in a drag-and-drop fashion, with no installation required. We compared this method with three alter- Figure 1: BarDensr uses non-negative regression to demix and deconvolve the observed image stack, yielding a sparse intensity image for each barcode.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The method requires about two minutes of compute time on a Amazon GPU instance to process a seven-round, four-channel 1000 × 1000-voxel field of view from an experiment targeting 79 different transcripts. We also provide an implementation for the NeuroCAAS web-service [ 12 ], which can be used in a drag-and-drop fashion, with no installation required. We compared this method with three alternatives: the ‘spot-based’ and ‘pixel-based’ methods of starfish ; a ‘blobs-first’ approach (Single Round Matching, or SRM, based on methods from [ 5 , 8 ]); and a ‘barcodes-first’ approach (Correlation approach, or ‘corr,’ based on [ 6 , 10 , 11 ]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%