2022
DOI: 10.3390/brainsci12060787
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Neurosurgical Clinical Trials for Glioblastoma: Current and Future Directions

Abstract: The mainstays of glioblastoma treatment, maximal safe resection, radiotherapy preserving neurological function, and temozolomide (TMZ) chemotherapy have not changed for the past 17 years despite significant advances in the understanding of the genetics and molecular biology of glioblastoma. This review highlights the neurosurgical foundation for glioblastoma therapy. Here, we review the neurosurgeon’s role in several new and clinically-approved treatments for glioblastoma. We describe delivery techniques such … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 68 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…After surgery, the smallest amount of residual tumor correlates with higher survivals [ 287 , 288 ]. However, radical surgical resection is limited by the highly invasive nature of GB cells [ 289 ].…”
Section: Present Therapy and Challengesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After surgery, the smallest amount of residual tumor correlates with higher survivals [ 287 , 288 ]. However, radical surgical resection is limited by the highly invasive nature of GB cells [ 289 ].…”
Section: Present Therapy and Challengesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the development of CED in the 1990s, there have been many advancements over the years. Although CED in its current state has limited anti-tumor effects for astrocytomas, it may show promise in the near future with many current clinical trials seeking to improve the technique [197,198]. Another method to cross the BBB employed by Gregory et al [196] is nanoparticle technology.…”
Section: Future Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, manual labeling of brain tumor lesions by physicians alone is time-consuming and requires a high level of diagnostic experience, and the accuracy of labeling tumor lesions still needs to be considered. In contrast, the utilization of computer-aided medical technology for tumor diagnosis is not only convenient and fast, but also less dependent on cumulative experience, which has broad development prospects and practical significance [ 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%