2021
DOI: 10.1177/09637214211030253
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Neuroticism and Disorders of Emotion: A New Synthesis

Abstract: We describe an approach to anxiety, depressive, trauma-related, and other disorders, which we conceptualize as “emotional disorders” because of shared underlying dimensions uncovered by the study of traits or temperaments. We then explicate a functional model of emotional disorders based largely, but not exclusively, on the temperament of neuroticism and describe common factors that account for the development and maintenance of these conditions. We conclude by describing, and presenting supporting data for, a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
68
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(70 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
2
68
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Neuroticism describes an underlying temperamental vulnerability to emotional disorders such as anxiety and depression, which varies individually [ 16 , 40 , 41 , 42 ]. It combines heightened negative emotionality with emotional reactivity [ 16 , 42 ] and, in addition to its mental health outcomes including its association with co-occurrence of mental disorders [ 43 ], it predicts lower subjective wellbeing [ 44 ], reduced positive affect [ 45 ], and poorer physical health [ 46 ].…”
Section: Neuroticism and Emotional Disordersmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Neuroticism describes an underlying temperamental vulnerability to emotional disorders such as anxiety and depression, which varies individually [ 16 , 40 , 41 , 42 ]. It combines heightened negative emotionality with emotional reactivity [ 16 , 42 ] and, in addition to its mental health outcomes including its association with co-occurrence of mental disorders [ 43 ], it predicts lower subjective wellbeing [ 44 ], reduced positive affect [ 45 ], and poorer physical health [ 46 ].…”
Section: Neuroticism and Emotional Disordersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To explain mental health outcomes, and particularly prevalence of emotional disorders, in the context of COVID-19 social distancing, we adopt the functional definition of emotional disorders, which characterizes such disorders as involving frequent, intense, excessive negative emotions and aversive reactivity to negative emotional experiences [ 14 , 15 ]—that is, neuroticism [ 16 ]. We contend that individuals high in neuroticism, and who also display associated emotion-motivated avoidant coping, are, theoretically, most likely to experience emotional disorders following social distancing.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, findings on robot-assisted interventions, such as those using Jibo [62], were in line with current research and help to suggest the need for further analysis. Deepening the association between personality traits and mental health outcomes in HRI research could not only enrich emerging models [65], but also explore new ways to personalize interventions. Finally, further knowledge could contribute to improving interventions' effectiveness, potentially enhancing patients' mental health.…”
Section: Study Results Organized By Robot Employedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If clinical psychology is going to change the basis for how mental illness is conceptualized, assessed, and treated, then the new system should be better than the old system. At some point, this means moving on from the like-goes-with-like symptom approach to classification and focusing on more progressive, dynamic, novel, and diverse classification strategies and theories (e.g., Barlow et al, 2021; Beck & Haigh, 2014; Berenbaum, 2013; Borsboom, 2017a; Del Giudice & Haltigan, 2021; Follette & Houts, 1996; Gone & Kirmayer, 2010; Luyten & Blatt, 2011; Mansell et al, 2009; Molenaar, 2004; Robinaugh et al, 2021; Smith et al, 2009; Thomas & Sharp, 2019; Wilshire et al, 2021; Zachar & Kendler, 2017).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%