2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2014.07.054
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Neurotoxic potential of ingested ZnO nanomaterials on bees

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
31
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
1
31
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Among the most important pollinators and direct contact with that of the crops leads to face many threats by nanotechnology as it is used abundantly in the pest control strategies. Therefore, there is a big need for examine the toxic effects of nanoparticles on honey bees [31]. A report has confirmed the neurotoxicity of ingested zinc oxide nanomaterials ZnO nanoparticles on honey bees.…”
Section: Beesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among the most important pollinators and direct contact with that of the crops leads to face many threats by nanotechnology as it is used abundantly in the pest control strategies. Therefore, there is a big need for examine the toxic effects of nanoparticles on honey bees [31]. A report has confirmed the neurotoxicity of ingested zinc oxide nanomaterials ZnO nanoparticles on honey bees.…”
Section: Beesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is expected that GST activity may be either increased or decreased due to production of lipid hydroperoxides. [45][46][47] Despite the fact that only about half as many genes for GSTs, carboxyl/cholinesterases, and P450 monooxygenases have been found in the honeybee genome compared to other insects, 48,49 the honeybees' GST detoxification system is altered upon intoxication. Monitoring of GST activity was previously used to assess environmental quality 21,50 and to investigate the toxic potential of NMs in honeybees after acute 51 and chronic dietary exposure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Monitoring of GST activity was previously used to assess environmental quality 21,50 and to investigate the toxic potential of NMs in honeybees after acute 51 and chronic dietary exposure. 47,52 The aim of our study was to investigate if nCeO 2 affects the honeybees A. m. carnica after chronic 9 days' exposure. nCeO 2 was tested because of its extensive commercial use, 2,53 the possibility for honeybees to be exposed to nCeO 2 1,15-17 and the lack of data on the potential hazard for honeybees.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A range of other factors have also been suggested to contribute to CCD, including, as only a partial list, climate change (Le Conte and Navajas ), air pollution (Girling et al ; McFrederick et al ), the alteration of the bee microbiome (Cox‐Foster et al ; Mattila et al ), predation by other insects (Core et al ), electromagnetic radiation from the sun (Ferrari ), the total chemical environment of honey bees (Mullin et al ), bee colony personality and exposure to early life stress (Rittschof et al ; Wray et al ), ecosemiotic collapse (Harries‐Jones ), and nanomaterials (Milivojevic et al ). The question among some researchers then, as these explanations convey, is not what causes CCD but what may have not yet been discovered.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%