Neurotoxicology of Nanomaterials

Abstract

The remarkable advances coming about through nanotechnology promise to revolutionize many aspects of modern life; however, these advances come with a responsibility for due diligence to ensure that they are not accompanied by adverse consequences for human health or the environment. Many novel nanomaterials (having at least one dimension <100 nm) could be highly mobile if released into the environment and are also very reactive, which has raised concerns for potential adverse impacts including, among others, the potential for neurotoxicity. Several lines of evidence led to concerns for neurotoxicity, but perhaps none more than observations that inhaled nanoparticles impinging on the mucosal surface of the nasal epithelium could be internalized into olfactory receptor neurons and transported by axoplasmic transport into the olfactory bulbs without crossing the blood−brain barrier. From the olfactory bulb, there is concern that nanomaterials may be transported deeper into the brain and affect other brain structures. Of course, people will not be exposed to only engineered nanomaterials, but rather such exposures will occur in a complex mixture of environmental materials, some of which are incidentally generated particles of a similar inhalable size range to engineered nanomaterials. To date, most experimental studies of potential neurotoxicity of nanomaterials have not considered the potential exposure sources and pathways that could lead to exposure, and most studies of nanomaterial exposure have not considered potential neurotoxicity. Here, we present a review of potential sources of exposures to nanoparticles, along with a review of the literature on potential neurotoxicity of nanomaterials. We employ the linked concepts of an aggregate exposure pathway (AEP) and an adverse outcome pathway (AOP) to organize and present the material. The AEP includes a sequence of key events progressing from material sources, release to environmental media, external exposure, internal exposure, and distribution to the target site. The AOP begins with toxicant at the target site causing a molecular initiating event and, like the AEP, progress sequentially to actions at the level of the cell, organ, individual, and population. Reports of nanomaterial actions are described at every key event along the AEP and AOP, except for changes in exposed populations that have not yet been observed. At this last stage, however, there is ample evidence of population level effects from exposure to ambient air particles that may act similarly to engineered nanomaterials. The data give an overall impression that current exposure levels may be considerably lower than those reported experimentally to be neurotoxic. This impression, however, is tempered by the absence of long-term exposure studies with realistic routes and levels of exposure to address concerns for chronic accumulation of materials or damage. Further, missing across the board are "key event relationships", which are quantitative expressions linking the key events of either the AEP or ...

The plastic brain: neurotoxicity of micro- and nanoplastics

“…Earlier studies identified the (central) nervous system as an important target for the toxic effects of metal and metal-oxide nanoparticles [39][40][41]. Metal and metal-oxide nanoparticles can enter the brain by crossing the blood-brain-barrier (BBB) or can surpass this barrier via retrograde transport through olfactory nerve endings [38,[42][43][44].…”

Quadruple abnormal protein aggregates in brainstem pathology and exogenous metal-rich magnetic nanoparticles (and engineered Ti-rich nanorods). The substantia nigrae is a very early target in young urbanites and the gastrointestinal tract a key brainstem portal

“…[46][47] Compared with larger particles, ultrafine particles are far more numerous, highly reactive, and able to gain access to all major organs of the body. [48][49][50][51] Of particular concern, transition metal-rich NPs, such as those formed abundantly as combustion-and friction-derived nanoparticles (CFDNPs), may act as catalysts for formation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and for protein misfolding, aggregation and fibril formation. 7, 10, 12,14-18, 32,33, 41, 53-63 Here, we investigate AD and PD neuropathological hallmarks in the brainstem in young MMC residents, and their associations with the presence, location and composition of exogenous, metal-rich NPs in the brainstem and cerebellum.…”

Nano-Enable Materials Promoting Sustainability and Resilience in Modern Agriculture

“…It is reported that most of the innovative nanomaterials are highly mobile, easily dispersible, and very reactive once they are released into the environment, i.e., soil, air, and water, posing a potential threat to human health [ 162 ]. Regarding the release, it has been observed some metals, e.g., silver (Ag) and Cu, and metal oxides, e.g., ZnO and iron oxide (FeO), may dissolve quickly, while others, e.g., TiO 2 , silicon dioxide (SiO 2 ), CNTs, graphene, are more persistent and may pose potential risks and hazards [ 163 ]. The prevailing exposure routes of humans to nanomaterials are inhalation (major exposure route), ingestion, and dermal routes, the last being considered negligible.…”