1990
DOI: 10.1038/jcbfm.1990.71
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Neurotransmission in the Sheep Middle Cerebral Artery: Modulation of Responses by 5-HT and Haemolysate

Abstract: Summary:In ring sections of the sheep middle cerebral artery, electrical field stimulation elicits a complex re sponse due to the simultaneous release of vasodilator and vasoconstrictor neurotransmitters. Haemolysate abol ishes the relaxant effects of the vasodilator neurotrans mitter and causes a marked augmentation of the contrac tile response in both the presence (448 ± 191%) and ab sence (409 ± 134%) of an intact endothelium. The haemolysate also reverses relaxation induced by sodium nitroprusside or sodiu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1991
1991
2003
2003

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…36 It has previously been shown, like the results reported here, that SAH induces an increased sensitivity of cerebral arteries toward 5-HT. 22,35 The increased sensitivity, in view of the lack of clinical effect of 5-HT antagonists, could be explained as a passive secondary phenomenon to the products of fibrin degradation, 10 to hemoglobin and serum, 37 and to hemolysate; 11 however, the novelty of the present study lies in our use of more specific antagonists and more advanced molecular biological techniques. With these methods we have clearly shown which receptor is upregulated (the 5-HT 1B receptor) and that this upregulation is due to a synthesis of mRNA, which in turn is a result of increased gene transcription.…”
Section: Relating Our Results To Existing Knowledge On the Involvemenmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…36 It has previously been shown, like the results reported here, that SAH induces an increased sensitivity of cerebral arteries toward 5-HT. 22,35 The increased sensitivity, in view of the lack of clinical effect of 5-HT antagonists, could be explained as a passive secondary phenomenon to the products of fibrin degradation, 10 to hemoglobin and serum, 37 and to hemolysate; 11 however, the novelty of the present study lies in our use of more specific antagonists and more advanced molecular biological techniques. With these methods we have clearly shown which receptor is upregulated (the 5-HT 1B receptor) and that this upregulation is due to a synthesis of mRNA, which in turn is a result of increased gene transcription.…”
Section: Relating Our Results To Existing Knowledge On the Involvemenmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…It is unlikely that the actions of L-NMMA described here can be ascribed to nonselective action since there was no functional endothelium in any of the tissues examined and the relaxant responses to CGRP were unaffected by L-NMMA. Immunohistochemical studies have shown a dense network of nerves containing VIP-like immunoreactivity in the sheep middle cerebral artery. It is not possible to state conclusively that VIP is the neurogenic mediator of relaxation from these studies; however, it does seem plausible since VIP is present in perivascular nerves and both VIP and the neurogenic mediator appear to act through a similar mechanism which is sensitive to both haemolysate (Gaw et al, 1990) and L-NMMA. It is not possible to rule out a minor contribution by CGRP to the neurogenic relaxant response, but any such contribution would have to be very small since CGRP is not affected by haemolysate and the CGRP innervation of the sheep middle cerebral artery is sparser than the VIP innervation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…The VIP-induced relaxation of the sheep middle cerebral artery, like the neurogenic mediator of relaxation (Gaw et al, 1990), was susceptible to inhibition by a haemolysate solution from feline erythrocytes. This inhibitory action of haemolysate appeared to be selective since the relaxation induced by CGRP, another vasodilator peptide, was unaffected.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation