2005
DOI: 10.1097/01.prs.0000149405.89201.9e
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Neurovascularized Free Short Head of the Biceps Femoris Muscle Transfer for One-Stage Reanimation of Facial Paralysis

Abstract: The single-stage technique for cross-face reanimation of the paralyzed face without nerve graft is an improvement over the two-stage procedure because it results in early reinnervation of the transferred muscle and shortens the period of rehabilitation. On the basis of an anatomic investigation, the short head of the biceps femoris muscle with attached lateral intermuscular septum of the thigh was identified as a new candidate for microneurovascular free muscle transfer. The authors performed one-stage transfe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
13
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This may be related to the variability of the number of axons that reach the target muscle since they must grow through two coaptations, thus potentially decreasing the axonal load and the recruitment of potential motor units. To overcome this, a one-stage FFMT for smile reanimation has gained popularity innervated by different donor nerves including the contralateral facial by using a muscle with a long nerve or performing additional manoeuvres to increase the length of the nerve [10][11][12][13][14]. Between other donor nerves (mostly branches of the V, XI, or XII cranial nerves [15][16][17]) used as neurotisers for the FFMT, the motor branch of the masseter nerve has gained popularity worldwide because of its predictable results, rapid muscle innervation, low donor site morbidity, and potential for cortical plasticity [7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This may be related to the variability of the number of axons that reach the target muscle since they must grow through two coaptations, thus potentially decreasing the axonal load and the recruitment of potential motor units. To overcome this, a one-stage FFMT for smile reanimation has gained popularity innervated by different donor nerves including the contralateral facial by using a muscle with a long nerve or performing additional manoeuvres to increase the length of the nerve [10][11][12][13][14]. Between other donor nerves (mostly branches of the V, XI, or XII cranial nerves [15][16][17]) used as neurotisers for the FFMT, the motor branch of the masseter nerve has gained popularity worldwide because of its predictable results, rapid muscle innervation, low donor site morbidity, and potential for cortical plasticity [7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, one-stage transfer using the various muscles is developing and becoming the first choice, especially among Asian surgeons. 3,4,[17][18][19] Muscle transfer is more time consuming and labor intensive than cross-face nerve grafting but offers an assured method with which to obtain sufficient power in the cheek to achieve a symmetrical smile. We thus believe that one-stage muscle transfer is better than cross-face nerve graft with or without muscle transfer.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Free flaps for facial reanimation can be obtained from limb and trunk muscles including gracilis (Sassoon et al 1991, Terzis and Noah 1997, Bae et al 2006, Faria et al 2007), latissimus dorsi (Dellon and Mackinnon 1985, Wei et al 1999, Harrison 2002, Faria et al 2007), pectoralis minor (Terzis and Noah 1997, Harrison 2002), biceps femoris (Hayashi and Maruyama 2005), and rectus (Marek and Pu 2004) or oblique (Wang et al 2002) abdominus. This strategy also has considerable potential for treating other skeletal muscle paralyses.…”
Section: Significance Of Sihler's Technique In Physiological and Clinmentioning
confidence: 99%