Neutral theory and the species abundance distribution: recent developments and prospects for unifying niche and neutral perspectives

Abstract

Published in 2001, The Unified Neutral Theory of Biodiversity and Biogeography (UNTB) emphasizes the importance of stochastic processes in ecological community structure, and has challenged the traditional niche-based view of ecology. While neutral models have since been applied to a broad range of ecological and macroecological phenomena, the majority of research relating to neutral theory has focused exclusively on the species abundance distribution (SAD). Here, we synthesize the large body of work on neutral theory in the context of the species abundance distribution, with a particular focus on integrating ideas from neutral theory with traditional niche theory. First, we summarize the basic tenets of neutral theory; both in general and in the context of SADs. Second, we explore the issues associated with neutral theory and the SAD, such as complications with fitting and model comparison, the underlying assumptions of neutral models, and the difficultly of linking pattern to process. Third, we highlight the advances in understanding of SADs that have resulted from neutral theory and models. Finally, we focus consideration on recent developments aimed at unifying neutral- and niche-based approaches to ecology, with a particular emphasis on what this means for SAD theory, embracing, for instance, ideas of emergent neutrality and stochastic niche theory. We put forward the argument that the prospect of the unification of niche and neutral perspectives represents one of the most promising future avenues of neutral theory research.

Competition can lead to unexpected patterns in tropical ant communities

“…The question of whether rules do or do not govern the coexistence of species has interested ecologists for decades (Bell, 2001;Chesson, 2000;Connor and Simberloff, 1979;Diamond, 1975;Hubbell, 2001;Leibold, 1995;Matthews and Whittaker, 2014). All species interact, both with their environment, and with each other.…”

Development of Spatial Distribution Patterns by Biofilm Cells

“…Once microcolonies have formed, though, they can be seen as individual, multicellular, biological units that maximize their distances to each other in response to competition for resources. Ecological theory predicts that individuals closer to each other experience competition, which can lead to a shift in their position along the niche axis, and individuals immigrate into communities via a selforganized process (33)(34)(35). The results are groups of coexisting individuals, arranging in evenly spaced entities that are functionally equivalent (neutral) (33)(34)(35).…”

Biodiversity and environmental characteristics of the bycatch assemblages from the tropical tuna purse seine fisheries in the eastern Atlantic Ocean

“…The data were fitted to the following Diversity models (using the “vegan” package and “radlattice” function in R software): Null model (or Broken stick model), Preemption model (or Geometric model), Log‐normal model, Zipf model and Zipf–Mandelbrot model. A number of different criteria have been used to compare Diversity models; among them, Akaike's information criterion and Bayesian information criterion (BIC) were widely used (Matthews & Whittaker, ). The best model fitted is obtained with the lowest AIC and BIC value, which represents the best community structure.…”