Neutralization against Omicron sublineages (BA.2/BA.5/BQ.1.1/XBB/XBB.1.5) in bivalent BNT162b2-vaccinated HCWs with or without risk factors, or following BT infection with Omicron

Abstract

SARS-CoV-2-BA.4/5-adapted-bivalent-BNT162b2-vaccine (bvBNT), developed in response to the recent emergence of immune-evasive Omicron-variants, has been given to individuals who completed at least 2-doses of the monovalent-BNT162b2-vaccine (mvBNT). In the present cohort study, we evaluated neutralization-titers (NT50s) against Wuhan-strain (SCoV2Wuhan) and Omicron-sublineages including BA.2/BA.5/BQ.1.1/XBB/XBB.1.5, and vaccine-elicited S1-binding-IgG in sera from participants-vaccinated with 5th-bvBNT following 4th-mvBNT. The 5th-bvBNT-dose elicited good protective-activity against SCoV2Wuhan with geometric-mean (gMean)-NT50 of 1966–2091, higher than the peak-values post-4th-mvBNT with no statistical significance, and favorable neutralization-activity against not only BA.5 but also BA.2, with ~ 3.2-/~ 2.2-fold greater gMean-NT50 compared to the peak-values post-4th-mvBNT-dose, in participants with or without risk factors. However, neutralization-activity of sera post-5th-bvBNT-dose was low against BQ.1.1/XBB/XBB.1.5. Interestingly, participants receiving bvBNT following breakthrough (BT) infection during Omicron-wave had significantly enhanced neutralization-activity against SCoV2Wuhan/BA.2/BA.5 with ~ 4.6-/~ 6.3-/~ 8.1-fold greater gMean-NT50, respectively, compared to uninfected participants receiving bvBNT. Sera from BT-infected-participants receiving bvBNT had enhanced neutralization-activity against BQ.1.1/XBB/XBB.1.5 by ~ 3.8-fold compared to those from the same participants post-4th-mvBNT-dose, and had enhanced gMean-NT50 ~ 5.4-fold greater compared to those of uninfected-participants’ sera post-bvBNT. These results suggest that repeated stimulation brought about by exposure to BA.5’s-Spike elicit favorable cross-neutralization-activity against various SARS-CoV-2-variants.

Poor durability of the neutralizing response against XBB sublineages after a bivalent mRNA COVID‐19 booster dose in persons with HIV

“…We confirmed the role of hybrid immunity, defined as the history of SARS‐CoV‐2 natural infection in vaccinated people, in achieving higher levels of nAbs against all the tested variants. Indeed, in line with previous reports, nAbs titers were constantly higher in HI than in nHI at each time point and against all the variants tested 23–26 …”

“…Indeed, in line with previous reports, nAbs titers were constantly higher in HI than in nHI at each time point and against all the variants tested. [23][24][25][26] When assessing the ability to neutralize the currently prevalent changes were observed neither 3 months or 6 months after the vaccine booster nor did we demonstrate a difference due to hybrid immunity. We did not investigate the role and dynamics of T cell response directed against XBB sublineages, nevertheless, the impact of variants associated mutations on T cell responses seems to be limited, 28,29 by meaning that the preservation of T cells response directed toward more conserved targets in vaccine composition may be considered as a possible tool to increase vaccine effectiveness against future variants.…”