2021
DOI: 10.1186/s12977-021-00556-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Neutralization diversity of HIV-1 Indian subtype C envelopes obtained from cross sectional and followed up individuals against broadly neutralizing monoclonal antibodies having distinct gp120 specificities

Abstract: Background The potential use of the broadly neutralizing monoclonal antibodies (bnAbs) towards prophylaxis and treatment to HIV-1 is currently being explored. While a number of promising bnAbs have been discovered and a few of them have progressed towards clinical development, their extent of neutralization coverage with respect to global HIV-1 variants given the existence of genetically distinct subtypes and recombinants circulating globally is not clearly known. In the present study, we exami… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

1
0
1

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
1
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Importantly, these recent viruses displayed increased neutralization resistance to CAP256.25 (p = 0.03) and VRC07-523LS (p = 0.02) compared to the historical 200 Clade C Panel. These results are consistent with data from Indian Clade C viruses showing resistance to CAP256.25 at a population level over time [ 24 ]. Rademeyer et al also observed that viruses became increasingly resistant to VRC01 (CD4bs), PG9 (V2-binding) and 4E10 (MPER/gp41-binding) over a 13-year period [ 6 ].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Importantly, these recent viruses displayed increased neutralization resistance to CAP256.25 (p = 0.03) and VRC07-523LS (p = 0.02) compared to the historical 200 Clade C Panel. These results are consistent with data from Indian Clade C viruses showing resistance to CAP256.25 at a population level over time [ 24 ]. Rademeyer et al also observed that viruses became increasingly resistant to VRC01 (CD4bs), PG9 (V2-binding) and 4E10 (MPER/gp41-binding) over a 13-year period [ 6 ].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Rademeyer et al also observed that viruses became increasingly resistant to VRC01 (CD4bs), PG9 (V2-binding) and 4E10 (MPER/gp41-binding) over a 13-year period [ 6 ]. While a significant decrease in sensitivity to VRC01 was not observed in our study, we did note a trend towards resistance to VRC01 and 3BNC117, which share some signature contact sites [ 25 28 ], suggesting a shift in general resistance to CD4bs antibodies over time [ 6 , 24 ]. The increased resistance to CD4bs and V2 bnAbs suggests the possibility that similar responses are common in HIV infection and are responsible for applying selective pressure to viral populations.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 52%