2021
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2102.10844
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Neutrino Energy Loss Rates in 3-3-1 Models

D. T. Binh,
L. T. Hue,
V. H. Binh
et al.

Abstract: The stellar energy-loss rates Q due to the production of neutrino pair in the framework of 3-3-1 models are presented. The energy loss rate Q is evaluated for different values of3 in which β is a parameter used to define the charge operator in the 3-3-1 models. The correction to the rate which is compared with that of the Standard Model (δQ) is also evaluated. We show that the correction does not exceed 14% and gets the highest withThe contribution of dipole moment to the energy loss rate is small compared to … Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 40 publications
(62 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…has not been able enough to provide explanation for several fundamental issues, among them: the hierarchical masses and the mixing angles for both, the quark and the lepton sectors [2][3][4][5][6], charge quantization [7,8,[8][9][10][11][12], the strong CP violation [13][14][15][16], the small neutrino masses and their oscillations [17,18], and last but not least, the presence of dark matter and dark energy in the universe [19][20][21][22][23]. Because of this, many physicists believe that the SM does not stand for the final theory, representing only an effective model originated from a more fundamental one.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…has not been able enough to provide explanation for several fundamental issues, among them: the hierarchical masses and the mixing angles for both, the quark and the lepton sectors [2][3][4][5][6], charge quantization [7,8,[8][9][10][11][12], the strong CP violation [13][14][15][16], the small neutrino masses and their oscillations [17,18], and last but not least, the presence of dark matter and dark energy in the universe [19][20][21][22][23]. Because of this, many physicists believe that the SM does not stand for the final theory, representing only an effective model originated from a more fundamental one.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%