Neutrino masses along with fermion mass hierarchy

Abstract

Recently a new mechanism has been proposed to cure the problem of fermion mass hierarchy in the Standard Model (SM) model. In this scenario, all SM charged fermions other than top quark arise from higher dimensional operators involving the SM Higgs field. This model also predicted some interesting phenomenology of the Higgs boson. We generalize this model to accommodate neutrino masses (Dirac & Majorana) and also obtain the mixing pattern in the leptonic sector. To generate neutrino masses, we add extra three right handed neutrinos $(N_{iR})$ in this model.Comment: 20 pages, the content on results and phenomenology have been expanded, a new section on UV completion of the model has been added and also some new references, this version has been accepted by Physical Review

Analysis of Bose–Einstein correlation at 7 TeV by LHCb collaboration based on stochastic approach

“…Using the same procedure as that used for T-NBD, we are able to obtain the final formula for the BEC. Various papers related D-NBD are referred in [24][25][26][27].…”

Unified Analyses of Multiplicity Distributions and Bose–Einstein Correlations at the LHC Using Double-Stochastic Distributions

“…Herein, we propose the D-GGL formula [19] for analyzing the multiplicity distribution at LHC: P D-GGL (n, n ) = α 1 P GGL1 (n, k = 2, p 1 , n 1 ) + α 2 P GGL2 (n, k = 2, p 2 , n 2 ), (5) where k = 2 reflects the degree of freedom for the (+−) particle ensembles ( Fig. 1).…”

“…However, we cannot understand the behavior of the parameter: k = 7, 8 for lower energy (ISR) and k = 2, 3 for higher energy (SppS). The double-negative binomial distribution (D-NBD) [4,5] has been proposed to explain the KNO scaling [6] violation observed by the UA5 [7,8,9], using α 1 + α 2 = 1, P D-NBD (n, n ) = α 1 P NBD1 (n, k 1 , n 1 ) + α 2 P NBD2 (n, k 2 , n 2 ).…”

Unified description of multiplicity distributions and Bose–Einstein correlations at the LHC based on the three-negative binomial distribution

“…Its importance is, first of all, pointed out by Wilk and Wlodarczyk [5]. Taking into account of recent investigation on T-NBD, in addition to various studies on KNO scaling [6,7], based on the double-negative binomial distribution (D-NBD) [8][9][10][11][12], we would like to concentrate on the T-NBD in a different point of view, i.e., the identical particle effect [13][14][15] at LHC: (Related papers are as follows; theoretical studies [16][17][18] and empirical studies [19][20][21]. )…”