2016
DOI: 10.1007/jhep09(2016)030
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Neutrino oscillations at DUNE with improved energy reconstruction

Abstract: Abstract:We study the physics reach of the long-baseline oscillation analysis of the DUNE experiment when realistic simulations are used to estimate its neutrino energy reconstruction capabilities. Our studies indicate that significant improvements in energy resolution compared to what is customarily assumed are plausible. This improved energy resolution can increase the sensitivity to leptonic CP violation in two ways. On the one hand, the CP-violating term in the oscillation probability has a characteristic … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
49
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
2
49
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The first degeneracy appears for the wrong octant of θ 23 , which would otherwise be correctly determined by the interplay between the appearance and disappearance channels at DUNE (see e.g., ref. [80]). We have checked that this degeneracy is characterized by non zero values of α τ e with a non-trivial phase around π.…”
Section: Jhep04(2017)153mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first degeneracy appears for the wrong octant of θ 23 , which would otherwise be correctly determined by the interplay between the appearance and disappearance channels at DUNE (see e.g., ref. [80]). We have checked that this degeneracy is characterized by non zero values of α τ e with a non-trivial phase around π.…”
Section: Jhep04(2017)153mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here, we assumed the following values for the oscillation parameters [10], in agreement with the most recent global-fit results obtained by the NuFit collaboration [17]: sin 2 θ 12 = 0.310, sin 2 θ 13 = 0.02240, sin 2 θ 23 = 0.582, δ CP = 217 • = −2.50 rad, † Albeit not at all trivial and still under intense investigation, see, for example, Refs. [12,13]. Unless otherwise stated, we will assume these oscillation parameters to be the true values in our analyses going forward.…”
Section: The ν τ Sample At Dunementioning
confidence: 99%
“…A qualitatively different method was put forward in Refs. [12,13]. In those papers, it was suggested to sum up the ionization charges from all particles in the hadronic shower, with no thresholds.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%