Radioembolization with 90 Y microspheres represents a novel transarterial radiation treatment for liver tumors. The purpose of this pilot study was to evaluate the findings of postimplantation PET/CT of 90 Y glass microspheres. Methods: Three patients with hepatocellular carcinoma and 2 patients with liver metastases (1 neuroendocrine, 1 colorectal) underwent PET/CT after radioembolization. Four patients underwent imaging at 1 mo to assess response and confirm PET/CT findings; 1 patient underwent PET/CT at 4 d after 90 The tracer 90 Y is traditionally thought of as a pure b-emitter. Thus, current clinical practice involves determining the distribution of the microspheres through bremsstrahlung imaging combined with anatomic imaging via SPECT/CT (1). Because bremsstrahlung imaging is based on a SPECT acquisition that uses either a wide imaging window or multiple energy windows due to the continuum, the scattered photon cannot easily be distinguished from true photons. Consequently, bremsstrahlung imaging is not quantifiable, and thus accurate dose distribution cannot be obtained (2).In an effort to improve pretreatment evaluation and follow-up, microspheres containing radionuclides that emit both b-and g-radiations have been proposed, and treatment with microspheres includes the use of 166 Ho and 186 Re/ 188 Re. At the time of this article's publication, glass and poly (L-lactic acid) (PLLA) microspheres incorporating 186 Re/ 188 Re had not been tested in human subjects with liver tumors. However, 188 Re human serum albumin microspheres ( 188 Re-HSAM) have been tested in a small cohort of patients at a single institution (3). The maximum b-particle energy of 188 Re (2.12 MeV) is lower than that of 90 Y (2.28 MeV), thus necessitating 4-to 5-fold-higher activities to obtain an absorbed dose equivalent to that of 90 Y. Because the g-energy (155 keV) is comparable to other nuclear medicine imaging agents, 188 Re-HSAM seems to be a good candidate for radioembolization of liver tumors. However, no conclusive effects could be derived from the study performed by Liepe et al. because of the small cohort size and heterogeneity of the patients' primary disease (3). To properly evaluate the effect of radioembolization of hepatic malignancies with 188 Re-HSAM, more studies and a larger patient cohort are warranted.Another promising radionuclide proposed for radioembolization of hepatic tumors is 166 Ho (maximum energy of the b-particle, 1.77 [48.7%] and 1.85 [50.5%] MeV and energy of the g-ray, 81 keV [6.7%]). 166 Ho PLLA microspheres are currently being used in patients with hepatic malignancies under a phase I clinical trial (4,5). Similar to the 188 Re HSAM dosimetry, the absorbed radiation dose per activity of 166 Ho (8.7 mGy/MBq) is lower than that of 90 Y (28 mGy/MBq). As a result, with 166 Ho 3 times the radioactivity will be required for radioembolization to achieve a dosimetry equivalent to that of 90 Y. The greatest advantage of 166 Ho is that it represents a multimodality imaging agent (6). The paramagnetic pro...