2020
DOI: 10.1007/s10509-020-03756-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Neutron and quark stars: constraining the parameters for simple EoS using the GW170817

Abstract: stars models using the MIT bag EoS for different values of the vacuum energy density B.

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…All candidates are in the stable region models (to the right of the maximum mass) baryonic mass density. This difference could have significant consequences when describing the parameter space range in a compact object description [85].…”
Section: Energy Density: Baryonic Vs Total Massmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All candidates are in the stable region models (to the right of the maximum mass) baryonic mass density. This difference could have significant consequences when describing the parameter space range in a compact object description [85].…”
Section: Energy Density: Baryonic Vs Total Massmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…But in reality, neutron stars may have different EOS depending on the internal material composition. For example, the EOS of a quark star and a neutron star are likely to be different (Arroyo-Chvez et al 2020;Weber et al 2012). We shall leave this problem in our future research.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%