2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.astropartphys.2004.04.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Neutron background at the Canfranc underground laboratory and its contribution to the IGEX-DM dark matter experiment

Abstract: A quantitative study of the neutron environment in the Canfranc Underground Laboratory has been performed. The analysis is based on a complete set of simulations and, particularly, it is focused on the IGEX-DM dark matter experiment. The simulations are compared to the IGEX-DM low energy data obtained with different shielding conditions. The results of the study allow us to conclude, with respect to the IGEX-DM background, that the main neutron population, coming from radioactivity from the surrounding rock, i… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
16
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
3
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The source intensity at time of irradiation was 3.72x10 4 neutrons s −1 , giving a total flux of 0.463 n cm −2 s −1 at 80 cm (the nearest lead surface). This value is five orders of magnitude greater than the estimated flux in the LAB2500 [37] or the one measured in "Hall A" [38] of the Canfranc laboratory, both in agreement with typical values of neutron flux underground [39]. Therefore, neutron background is negligible in our data.…”
Section: Irradiation With 252 Cf Neutronssupporting
confidence: 53%
“…The source intensity at time of irradiation was 3.72x10 4 neutrons s −1 , giving a total flux of 0.463 n cm −2 s −1 at 80 cm (the nearest lead surface). This value is five orders of magnitude greater than the estimated flux in the LAB2500 [37] or the one measured in "Hall A" [38] of the Canfranc laboratory, both in agreement with typical values of neutron flux underground [39]. Therefore, neutron background is negligible in our data.…”
Section: Irradiation With 252 Cf Neutronssupporting
confidence: 53%
“…The obtained rates are shown in table 3; the neutron moderator makes the contribution from these neutrons irrelevant. Concerning muon-induced neutrons in the rock surrounding the laboratory, the expected flux is ∼3 orders of magnitude lower than that of the environmental neutrons [68].…”
Section: Neutronsmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…The effect of neutrons from other origins has been analyzed for TREX-DM too. First, environmental neutrons at LSC have been simulated from a virtual sphere containing the set-up with the 40-cm-thick moderator and the results have been normalized to the neutron flux measured at LSC in [67] (similar to that presented in [68]); the evaporation spectrum has been considered for the neutron energy sampling. A preliminary analysis of the tracks left in the chamber points to a rejection factor of ∼10% of the events in the RoI.…”
Section: Neutronsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their activities can be considered small in comparison to other inner components. Regarding external components, we have made a rough estimation of the contribution of the AGET-based electronics (based on #27 of Table 1), the lead shielding (#2 of Table 1), the environmental gamma flux [77] and the LSC rock-induced neutrons [80]. Their contribution to background level will be below counts keV kg day if the external shielding is composed of a lead layer of 20 cm thickness and a polyethylene layer of 40 cm thickness.…”
Section: Background Model Of Trex-dm At Lscmentioning
confidence: 99%