“…As seen in Table 6, the experimental and the evaluated values for the thermal neutron cross-section of the 165 Ho(n,c) 166g Ho reaction are varied from 58 [8] to 67 barn [23,27]. The present result of 59.7 ± 2.5 barn is in good agreement within 4.2% (1r) with the experimental data obtained by Rajput et al [3], Yucel et al [5], De Corte [6], Holden [8], Kafala et al [10], De Corte and Simonits [12], Gryntakis et al [13], Mughabghab [14], Simonits et al [15], Heft [16], Ryves and Zieba [20], Zimmerman et el., [26] and Seren et al, [31]. However, the present result differs from the evaluated results of ENDF/B-VII.0 [4], Mughabghab [7], JFF2.2 [11], and also some experimental data of Danon et al [9], Erdtmann [17], Steinnes [21], Walker [22], Scoville and Rogers [23], THAI-AEC-10 [25], Stephenson [27], Keisch and Faler [29], and Pomerance [30] by 5.5-12.2%.…”