2009
DOI: 10.1103/physrevc.79.014613
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Neutron induced fission ofPu240,242from 1 eV to 200 MeV

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

21
38
6

Year Published

2009
2009
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(65 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
21
38
6
Order By: Relevance
“…The previous experiment carried out at the n TOF's Experimental Area 1 (EAR-1), was unsuccessful due to detector deterioration caused by the high alpha activity of the 240 Pu samples in addition to the long period needed to complete the measurement [5], therefore the neutron induced fission cross section had to be remeasured in the newly constructed experimental area EAR-2, which offers a higher background suppression and a significantly higher instantaneous neutron flux, thus reducing the time needed to complete the measurement. Similar recent measurements have also been performed at GNEIS [6], LANSCE [7] and IRMM [8].…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 51%
“…The previous experiment carried out at the n TOF's Experimental Area 1 (EAR-1), was unsuccessful due to detector deterioration caused by the high alpha activity of the 240 Pu samples in addition to the long period needed to complete the measurement [5], therefore the neutron induced fission cross section had to be remeasured in the newly constructed experimental area EAR-2, which offers a higher background suppression and a significantly higher instantaneous neutron flux, thus reducing the time needed to complete the measurement. Similar recent measurements have also been performed at GNEIS [6], LANSCE [7] and IRMM [8].…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 51%
“…(The accuracy of the evaluated data is usually not declared. In the region of interest, 0.01 < T 9 < MeV, the accuracy of up-to-date measurements for plutonium isotopes by Tovesson et al 2009 varies from 2% to 15%, and for our plots is not bigger than the plot signs. The detailed experimental information can be found in the experimental nuclear reaction data library 2009.)…”
Section: The Statistical Model and Nuclear Data Inputmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Compared to the data of Staples et al [22], the accordance in absolute scale is above 99%. The discrepancy to the Tovesson [4] data set is around 2% in the considered energy range. Larger deviations to the Weigmann data [20] in the order of 5.4% are present especially in the plateau region between 1.2 MeV and 5 MeV.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…[3]. Results of measurements at the Los Alamos National Laboratory by Tovesson et al [4] and at the Joint Research Center Geel by Salvador-Castiñeira et al [3] were published recently and tend to be lower than present evaluated nuclear data [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 83%