1990
DOI: 10.1016/0375-9474(90)90360-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Neutron-induced production of protons, deuterons and tritons on copper and bismuth

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
24
0

Year Published

1990
1990
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Fig. 19 demonstrates this for 317 MeV n + 209 Bi → t at 54 • , with experimental data measured by Franz, et al [81]. We have obtained similar results for other neutroninduced reactions, at other incident energies, for other ejectiles and target nuclei.…”
Section: Validation Of the Extended Modelssupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Fig. 19 demonstrates this for 317 MeV n + 209 Bi → t at 54 • , with experimental data measured by Franz, et al [81]. We have obtained similar results for other neutroninduced reactions, at other incident energies, for other ejectiles and target nuclei.…”
Section: Validation Of the Extended Modelssupporting
confidence: 87%
“…23 show an example of double-differential spectra of complex particles from neutron-induced reactions, at even higher energies, namely CEM03.01 calculated double-differential spectra of p, d, and t at 54, 68, 90, 121, and 164 degrees from interactions of 542 MeV neutrons with copper and bismuth compared with the measurements by Franz et al [138]. We see again a good agreement between the calculations and the data and again the main contribution in the production of d and t from these reactions by CEM03.01 is from preequilibrium emission.…”
Section: Preequilibrium Reactionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The systematic error on the recoil energy measurement is due to the uncertainty in the MINERvA detector energy scale set by muons and differences between the simulated calorimetric response to single hadrons and the response measured by the test beam program. Additional uncertainties are due to differences between the Geant model of neutron interactions and thin target data on neutron scattering in carbon, iron and copper [39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46]. We evaluate further sources of systematic error by loosening analysis cuts on energy near the vertex and on extra isolated energy depositions, repeating the fit to the background and subsequent analysis, and assigning an uncertainty to cover the difference.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%