2011
DOI: 10.1088/0954-3899/38/11/115104
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Neutron–proton effective mass splitting and thermal evolution in neutron-rich matter

Abstract: The thermal evolution of properties of neutron rich asymmetric nuclear matter such as entropy density, internal energy density, free energy density and pressure are studied in the non-relativistic mean field theory using finite range effective interactions. In this framework the thermal evolution of nuclear matter properties is directly connected to the neutron and proton effective mass properties. Depending on the magnitude of neutron-proton effective mass splittings, two distinct behaviours in the thermal ev… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
57
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 68 publications
2
57
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In isospin asymmetric matter, it is the difference of single-particle potentials for neutrons and protons that is responsible for various isospin-dependent phenomena. Thus, instead of studying the single-nucleon potentials, interesting features can be revealed more easily by examining individually the isoscalar potential U 0 ≈ (U n + U p )/2 (28) and the symmetry (isovector) potential…”
Section: Symmetry (Isovector or Lane) Potentials Predicted By Nuclearmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In isospin asymmetric matter, it is the difference of single-particle potentials for neutrons and protons that is responsible for various isospin-dependent phenomena. Thus, instead of studying the single-nucleon potentials, interesting features can be revealed more easily by examining individually the isoscalar potential U 0 ≈ (U n + U p )/2 (28) and the symmetry (isovector) potential…”
Section: Symmetry (Isovector or Lane) Potentials Predicted By Nuclearmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is a meaningful question as it has been known that the DBHF predictions depend strongly on approximation schemes and techniques used to determine the Lorentz and the isovector structure of the nucleon self-energy [58]. Figure 8. Left: Comparisons of symmetry potentials at saturation density as a function of momentum k predicted using (1) a phenomenological model with two different forms of the isospin-dependent finite-range interaction by Behera et al [28], (2) the extended BHF calculations by Zuo et al [59], (3) the DBHF calculations by van Dalen et al [58] and (4) the DBHF calculations by Sammarruca et al [127], Modified from a figure in ref. [28].…”
Section: Symmetry (Isovector or Lane) Potentials Predicted By Nuclearmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The finite range effective interaction (SEI) thus constructed in the simplest form containing a single finite range term is given as, [16,17] and for Yukawa form in Refs. [18,19]. The complete study of ANM requires the knowledge of altogether nine parameters, namely, b, γ, α, ε l ex , ε ul ex , ε l γ , ε ul γ , ε l 0 and ε ul 0 .…”
Section: Formalismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the knowledge of the two parameters α and ε ex determined from the momentum dependence of isoscalar mean field at normal density ρ 0 , the complete study of SNM can be performed for a given γ if one assumes only the standard NM values of ρ 0 , e(ρ 0 ) and m. To extend the study to ANM, one needs to know how ε ex , ε γ and ε 0 split into like and unlike isospin channels. The splitting of ε ex into ε l ex and ε ul ex is decided using the physical constraint resulting from the studies of the thermal evolution of NM properties [19]. This study predicts a critical value of the splitting of ε ex for which the thermal evolution of NM properties as well as the entropy per particle in PNM does not exceed that of SNM.…”
Section: Formalismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The neutron-proton effective mass splitting has been studied for a long time [20][21][22][23][24] and recently becomes again a hot topic [25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34]. It is noteworthy that in relativistic models one needs to calculate the Lorentz mass so that it can be compared with that from the nonrelativistic interactions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%