1980
DOI: 10.1103/physrevc.21.2293
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Neutron richGa73andAs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

4
11
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
4
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A combination of the results from previous experiments opens the possibility of a 1/2 − , 3/2 − ground-state doublet in 73 Ga. The existence of such a doublet is compatible with the available transfer reaction data as the population of the yrast 1/2 − state is weak compared to the 3/2 − ground state in similar experiments studying 69,71 Ga [4,6,7]. From the energy systematics, there seems to be a more general structural difference between the odd-A gallium isotopes up to 69 Ga 38 and those with 40 neutrons or more (see Fig.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 85%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…A combination of the results from previous experiments opens the possibility of a 1/2 − , 3/2 − ground-state doublet in 73 Ga. The existence of such a doublet is compatible with the available transfer reaction data as the population of the yrast 1/2 − state is weak compared to the 3/2 − ground state in similar experiments studying 69,71 Ga [4,6,7]. From the energy systematics, there seems to be a more general structural difference between the odd-A gallium isotopes up to 69 Ga 38 and those with 40 neutrons or more (see Fig.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…2(b) it can be seen that the peak originating from the depopulation of the 199-keV state is Doppler-broadened. An excited state with an energy of 198(3) keV was observed previously in the one-proton stripping reaction with L = 3, restricting its spin and parity to 5/2 − , 7/2 − [7]. As this state is populated directly by Coulomb excitation, the spin can be firmly fixed as 5/2 − .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 61%
See 3 more Smart Citations