1993
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.48.13817
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Neutron-scattering study of antiferromagnetism inYBa2Cu3

Abstract: Both the static and dynamic properties of the antiferromagnetic state in YBa2Cu306. &5 have been reinvestigated by neutron scattering. The crystal studied exhibited a Neel temperature of 410 + 3 K, with a continuous transition below 15 K to a magnetic structure with a doubled unit cell along the c axis. The Cu magnetic form factor has been extracted from magnetic Bragg peak intensities measured at 15 K, and it is shown to have the large anisotropy expected for a Cu 3d 2 y2 state. The form-factor anisotropy ca… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

18
132
0
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 186 publications
(151 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
18
132
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Such a distinctively dominant magnetic energy scale immediately suggests that it is a key player in the mechanisms of the HTSC. The close relationship between the magnetism and the HTSC is supported by a body of INS studies, in particular by discoveries of the sharp resonance peak of magnetic excitations and the low-energy incommensurate scattering, the temperature, doping − y 2 ) orbital typically used for magnetic form factor calculations 6,13,28,29 . d,e, The equal-level surfaces of the magnetic form factor squared at |F(Q)| 2 = 0.13 ≈ 1/e 2 for the wavefunctions in a and b, respectively.…”
mentioning
confidence: 93%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Such a distinctively dominant magnetic energy scale immediately suggests that it is a key player in the mechanisms of the HTSC. The close relationship between the magnetism and the HTSC is supported by a body of INS studies, in particular by discoveries of the sharp resonance peak of magnetic excitations and the low-energy incommensurate scattering, the temperature, doping − y 2 ) orbital typically used for magnetic form factor calculations 6,13,28,29 . d,e, The equal-level surfaces of the magnetic form factor squared at |F(Q)| 2 = 0.13 ≈ 1/e 2 for the wavefunctions in a and b, respectively.…”
mentioning
confidence: 93%
“…25) and using the anisotropic magnetic form factor of the Cu 2+ ion, following the procedure adopted in previous studies 6,13,28,29 . Only two parameters are varied in such fitting: the in-chain exchange coupling J , which determines the overall energy scale of magnetic excitations, and the prefactor A, which accounts for the possible statistical and systematic errors of our intensity measurements and ideally should be equal to one.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This is the position that magnetism is found in the parent compound, YBa 2 Cu 3 O 6.15 , which is an insulator with a Néel transition temperature well above room temperature and has been studied previously. 10,11 The defining attribute of the DDW state is that the moment should be largely along the c-axis. Small moments in the sample crystal originating from the parent compound should be located in the a-b plane as is found for this material.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For x = 0.075 at 200 K and x = 0 at 5 K, the data for 0 ≤ L ≤ 4 are plotted. Note that the plotted integrated intensities are normalized by the magnetic form factor for the d x 2 −y 2 orbital [12]; thus, the results for the different L values can be directly compared. The results show that the intensities at different L values agree within the measurement uncertainty as shown by error bars.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%