1974
DOI: 10.1016/0003-4916(74)90203-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Neutron strength functions of nuclei in the deformed region

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The capture cross sections of 169 Tm have been measured in five laboratories before in the tens and hundreds keV energy range [3][4][5][6][7][8]. Among them, the activation method was used by Jiang Songsheng, while the others were performed using the prompt γ-rays method.…”
Section: A the Capture Cross Section Derived From The Capture Yieldmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The capture cross sections of 169 Tm have been measured in five laboratories before in the tens and hundreds keV energy range [3][4][5][6][7][8]. Among them, the activation method was used by Jiang Songsheng, while the others were performed using the prompt γ-rays method.…”
Section: A the Capture Cross Section Derived From The Capture Yieldmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the radioactivity induced by the reactions of 169 Tm Tm and 170 Tm Tm makes the 169 Tm an ideal spectrumsensitive activation detector for the neutron intensity diagnosis, in which the precise neutron capture cross section is of critical importance. However, there are still nonnegligible discrepancies between the values recommended by different evaluated nuclear data libraries for the neutron capture cross section of 169 Tm, although they have been carefully measured and evaluated before [3][4][5][6][7][8]. In the energy region above 100 keV, the capture cross sections of 169 Tm measured by the activation method [6] are systematically lower than those measured with the prompt γ-ray method [5], and there is as much as 20% difference between the evaluated values in ENDF/B-VIII.0 [9] and those in JEFF-3.3 [10].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The data on neutron strength functions are due either to the analysis of average capture cross sections or of neutron resonance parameters. P-wave neutron strength functions obtained so far (Gibbon et a2 1961, Chaubey and Sehgal 1965, 1966, Bilpuch et a2 1960, Murty et al 1973, Siddappa et al 1974 from the analysis of average capture cross sections are dependent on certain assumptions made about the P-wave gamma-ray strength function and the P-wave neutron reduced width distribution in the absence of experimental data on P-wave resonance parameters. Sand P-wave gamma-ray strength functions had been assumed to be equal (Gibbon et a1 1961, Chaubey and Sehgal 1965, 1966 a1 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%