2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.nucengdes.2020.110679
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Neutronics benchmark analysis of the EBR-II SHRT-45R with SAC-3D

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…At first, we assumed that each assembly's boundary condition in the radial direction is a total reflection and kept the axial direction boundary conditions the same as in the core neutronics calculation. en, we get the neutron flux distribution in the axial direction by conducting the onedimensional S N (Discrete ordinates method) calculation and do the needed cross-section homogenization as follows [8]:…”
Section: Neutronics Calculation Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At first, we assumed that each assembly's boundary condition in the radial direction is a total reflection and kept the axial direction boundary conditions the same as in the core neutronics calculation. en, we get the neutron flux distribution in the axial direction by conducting the onedimensional S N (Discrete ordinates method) calculation and do the needed cross-section homogenization as follows [8]:…”
Section: Neutronics Calculation Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A point neutronic calculation model is useful for analyzing a specific case of a power reactor system. In a large-scale system, a 3D neutronic calculation model was developed to analyze the plant system [15] more accurately. Using a 3D model applied in an established VVER-1000 NESTLE code also enhances the calculation of the spent nuclear fuel of a power reactor [16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various computational analyses of the EBR-II have been performed for different areas of interest, but only limited studies focused on neutronics analysis (e.g., [2][3][4][5]). Furthermore, at the time of this writing, only the EBR-II IRPhEP benchmark authors have published computational analyses based on the new IRPhEP benchmark specifications [1,6,7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%