2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.jfa.2016.02.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nevanlinna representations in several variables

Abstract: We generalize to several variables the classical theorem of Nevanlinna that characterizes the Cauchy transforms of positive measures on the real line. We show that for the Loewner class, a large class of analytic functions that have non-negative imaginary part on the upper polyhalf-plane, there are representation formulae in terms of densely-defined self-adjoint operators on a Hilbert space. We find four different representation formulae and we show that every function in the Loewner class has one of the four … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
52
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
52
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This class of functions has, so far, proven a bit less prominent in both mathematics and applications, but relates nonetheless to multidimensional passive systems [21] and homogenization of multicomponent media [10,16,17]. However, the class of Herglotz-Nevanlinna functions in several variables has seen a renewed interest in the last few years, especially from a pure mathematical perspective, with results concerning both integral representations of this class of functions [14,15], as well as operator representations [2,3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This class of functions has, so far, proven a bit less prominent in both mathematics and applications, but relates nonetheless to multidimensional passive systems [21] and homogenization of multicomponent media [10,16,17]. However, the class of Herglotz-Nevanlinna functions in several variables has seen a renewed interest in the last few years, especially from a pure mathematical perspective, with results concerning both integral representations of this class of functions [14,15], as well as operator representations [2,3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(Here we have concretely written R(x) = V * xV and used a resolvent of the form (L − X) −1 (L + X) instead of (1 − UX) −1 (1 + UX) to agree with [2,1]. However, L is still a unitary.…”
Section: Proof Of the Main Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We also want to mention that a subclass of these functions, namely the Herglotz-Agler functions, are characterized via operator representations and so-called µresolvents, cf. [3,4,6]. However, these results do not imply the integral representation mentioned above and cannot be used for our current purpose.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 82%