2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.fsir.2019.100050
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

New acquisitions of a contemporary Brazilian Identified Skeletal Collection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The sample consisted of a total of 483 humeri and 452 femurs, being 363 humeri and 343 left femurs and 120 humeri and 109 right femurs, obtained from 401 skeletons selected among the 427 ones belonging to the Identified Skeletal Collection of the Center for Studies in Forensic Anthropology (CEAF), University of Pernambuco (UPE), Brazil Cunha et al (2018), Carvalho et al (2020.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The sample consisted of a total of 483 humeri and 452 femurs, being 363 humeri and 343 left femurs and 120 humeri and 109 right femurs, obtained from 401 skeletons selected among the 427 ones belonging to the Identified Skeletal Collection of the Center for Studies in Forensic Anthropology (CEAF), University of Pernambuco (UPE), Brazil Cunha et al (2018), Carvalho et al (2020.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Forensic anthropological investigations on skeletonized human remains aim to identify and classify biological patterns through a process known as anthropological identification Torimitsu et al (2016), classically categorizing human skeletons regarding ancestry, sex, age, and stature, thus establishing the biological profile Navega et al (2015). This step makes it possible to establish identity or direct the identification process Canãdas and Gonzalo (2021).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Brazilian miscegenation and admixture are the result of economic, migratory, and ethnic-racial interrelationships, especially between ethnic groups of African, European and American Indian (Amerindian) ancestry (Carvalho-Silva et al, 2001), which makes it unique and highly regionalized (Cuzzullin et al, 2020;Tinoco et al, 2016). The systematic development and curation of identified osteological collections in Brazil have provided in recent years a more reliable source of skeletal remains for the study of Brazilian population fostering development and advances in forensic anthropology both nation and worldwide (Cunha et al, 2018;de Carvalho et al, 2020). These reference collections enable the systematic and rigorous analysis of published and available methods or protocols, which is vital to guarantee the accuracy and reliability of forensic analysis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2,[6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15] The great dilemma in forensic anthropology is the morphological and metric variability that exists between different populations, i.e., whether these peculiarities arise from historical and social contexts, climatic factors and/or food habits. 17 Thus, it is necessary to expand research in different populations aiming to establish a standard that can be applied efficiently to the purpose of the investigation. Thus, the objective of this study is to investigate the use of craniometry through analysis of linear measurements for the estimation of sex in a Brazilian population.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The research universe consisted of 427 skeletons cataloged according to sex and age belonging to the osteological collection of the Center for the Study of Forensic Anthropology (CEAF), Faculty of Dentistry, University of Pernambuco (FOP/UPE), located in the Northeast Region of Brazil. This collection is described in greater detail in the article by Carvalho et al 17 For sample selection, skeletons aged between 20 and 96 years with skulls were included.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%