2001
DOI: 10.1007/s004640000256
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

New adhesion formation after laparoscopic and conventional adhesiolysis

Abstract: This study aimed to compare new adhesion formation after laparoscopic and conventional adhesiolysis. In a first operation, 24 rabbits underwent fixation of deserosated cecum (6 cm2) to the lateral abdominal wall to induce standardized adhesions. After 4 weeks, adhesiolysis was performed by laparoscopy (n = 12) or laparotomy (n = 12). Outcome was assessed by the incidence, extent, and location of adhesion reformation. After conventional adhesiolysis, new adhesions developed in all the rabbits, as compared with … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
36
0
1

Year Published

2003
2003
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
36
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Generally in the present study, a higher readmission rate for ileus was observed in the O group than the L group. However, recent experimental and clinical reports have suggested that the risk of adhesion ileus associated with previous operation can be lowered by laparoscopic access [19,45,46]. One study reported at relaparoscopy a 10% risk of adhesion formation after previous laparoscopic operation vs an 80% risk after previous open operation [11].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Generally in the present study, a higher readmission rate for ileus was observed in the O group than the L group. However, recent experimental and clinical reports have suggested that the risk of adhesion ileus associated with previous operation can be lowered by laparoscopic access [19,45,46]. One study reported at relaparoscopy a 10% risk of adhesion formation after previous laparoscopic operation vs an 80% risk after previous open operation [11].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, none of the barriers has yet achieved sustained success. [5,6] Current agents such as HA-CMC (sodium hyaluronate -carboxymethylcellulose) and icodextrin are widely used in clinical practice, but the results with respect to their antiadhesive efficacy and biocompatibility are conflicting.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the success of the current methods in adhesion prevention has not been satisfactory. [14,15] The biocompatibility of the currently used antiadhesive products is not reliable. Several cases of postoperative acute aseptic peritonitis have been reported after using HA-CMC (Seprafilm) or 4% icodextrin (Adept).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, laparoscopy is likely to induce fewer adhesions than conventional laparotomy [21,22,27]. In experimental studies, laparoscopy caused fewer adhesions than laparotomy [19,23,31,49,75,87]. Lundorff et al also observed fewer adhesions after laparoscopic tubal surgery than after open surgery [51].…”
Section: Surgical Techniquementioning
confidence: 97%