2017
DOI: 10.1039/c6ib00251j
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

New advances in probing cell–extracellular matrix interactions

Abstract: This review highlights the application of recent innovations in microtechnologies, biomaterials, and imaging tools for probing cell–ECM interactions.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
45
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 308 publications
(336 reference statements)
0
45
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[34], so that in the absence of stress (F=0) e ii =P (summation convention applies), and we see that P represents the target area change of a material element. The underlying substrate is assumed to be an elastic material as is the standard for mechanotransduction assays and traction force microscopy [7,9,11]. In this case, the contraction of the cell is resisted by the substrate with the internal cellular stresses determined from the force balance…”
Section: Model Of Differential Contractililty In a Cell On A Deformabmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[34], so that in the absence of stress (F=0) e ii =P (summation convention applies), and we see that P represents the target area change of a material element. The underlying substrate is assumed to be an elastic material as is the standard for mechanotransduction assays and traction force microscopy [7,9,11]. In this case, the contraction of the cell is resisted by the substrate with the internal cellular stresses determined from the force balance…”
Section: Model Of Differential Contractililty In a Cell On A Deformabmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, a range of experimental techniques have been developed to measure cell-derived forces including traction force microscopy and other similar deformation-based approaches [7][8][9]. These, in combination, with substrates of carefully calibrated stiffness enable quantitative investigations into contractility and stiffness sensing [9][10][11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is significant evidence that the nanoscale structure of fibronectin in particular plays a key role in regulating diverse cell behaviors [33][34][35] and the same effect is likely to be observed in many other ECM components. Unfortunately, though there are advanced methods to image cell-ECM interaction at the nanoscale using both optical and electron microscopy, it is not yet possible to do so with whole-mount tissues [36]. The cell response to the microenvironment may indeed depend on the nanometer-scale structure of the ECM.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This awareness has driven a rapid expansion in the development of advanced biophysical techniques that probe the responses of cells to physical cues and to measure cell derived forces, including e.g. traction force microscopy, optical tweezers, molecular force sensors and atomic force microscopy-based approaches [3][4][5][6][7]. In parallel there has been much success in developing engineered tissue scaffolds that can be used in conjunction with cell experiments to control the physical properties of the cellular microenvironment, including substrate stiffness [8,9], topology [9,10] and ligand density and patterning [6,11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…traction force microscopy, optical tweezers, molecular force sensors and atomic force microscopy-based approaches [3][4][5][6][7]. In parallel there has been much success in developing engineered tissue scaffolds that can be used in conjunction with cell experiments to control the physical properties of the cellular microenvironment, including substrate stiffness [8,9], topology [9,10] and ligand density and patterning [6,11]. These advances together have demonstrated that a plethora of individual cellular behaviours respond to physical cues [12][13][14], with gel stiffness identified as a key control parameter.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%