2021
DOI: 10.1017/laq.2021.26
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

New AMS Radiocarbon Ages from the Preceramic Levels of Coxcatlan Cave, Puebla, Mexico: A Pleistocene Occupation of the Tehuacan Valley?

Abstract: Archaeological studies at Coxcatlan Cave in the Tehuacan Valley of southern Puebla, Mexico, have been instrumental to the development of the chronology for the region and for our understanding of the origins of food production in the Americas. This article refines the Preceramic chronology of the Tehuacan Valley by presenting 14 new accelerated mass spectrometry (AMS) radiocarbon ages from faunal bone samples uncovered from early depositional levels of the rock shelter. Although bones associated with the El Ri… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Simple stone tools discovered in Chiquihuite Cave, Mexico, date from ∼26,500 to 19,000 cal BP and represent a previously unknown tradition (Ardelean et al, 2020;Becerra-Valdivia and Higham, 2020). At Coxcatlan Cave, Mexico, re-dating butchered small mammals associated with minimally worked stone tools established a 33,448 to 28,279 cal BP date for the site's lowest cultural level (Somerville et al, 2021). Simple flaked stone artifacts are known from numerous ancient South American sites.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Simple stone tools discovered in Chiquihuite Cave, Mexico, date from ∼26,500 to 19,000 cal BP and represent a previously unknown tradition (Ardelean et al, 2020;Becerra-Valdivia and Higham, 2020). At Coxcatlan Cave, Mexico, re-dating butchered small mammals associated with minimally worked stone tools established a 33,448 to 28,279 cal BP date for the site's lowest cultural level (Somerville et al, 2021). Simple flaked stone artifacts are known from numerous ancient South American sites.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All five prehispanic irrigation networks were sampled, and all canal systems have dates of at least cal 3500 BC (Table 1 and Figure 3). These dates fall within the Abejas phase (c. 4425–2595 BC) of the Late Archaic period (MacNeish, 2001; Somerville et al, 2021). This was a time when MacNeish (2001) postulates that the first semi-permanent pit house villages developed on the valley bottom, as well as the widespread incorporation of domesticated plants into a diet still dominated by non-domesticates.…”
Section: Chronology Of the Fossilized Canal Systemsmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…Calibrated 2-sigma radiocarbon probability distributions with sample numbers and locality information grouped by canal system. Cultural chronologies are based on MacNeish (2001) and Somerville et al (2021).…”
Section: Chronology Of the Fossilized Canal Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…I currently think the best evidence points to an entry between 14,500 and 16,000 years ago to the continental US. There are a few very early (>20,000 cal BP) sites (e.g., the Cerutti Mastodon site in California, Chiquihuite and Coxcatlan Caves in central Mexico, and the White Sands footprints in New Mexico (Ardelean et al 2020;Bennett et al 2021;Holen et al 2017;Somerville et al 2021), but these have convinced few archaeologists (Braje et al 2017;Chatters et al 2021;Potter et al 2018;. Better evidence comes from the ∼16,000-year-old Gault/ Friedkin (Texas) and Coopers Ferry (Idaho) sites (Davis et al 2019;Waters et al 2011;Williams et al 2020), and the 14,500-year-old sites of Page-Ladson (Florida) and Paisley Cave (Oregon; Halligan et al 2016;Shillito et al 2020).…”
Section: Colonization Of the New Worldmentioning
confidence: 99%