2003
DOI: 10.1097/00129492-200307000-00019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

New and Modified Reporting Systems from the Consensus Meeting on Systems for Reporting Results in Vestibular Schwannoma

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
243
0
14

Year Published

2008
2008
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 340 publications
(260 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
3
243
0
14
Order By: Relevance
“…In the treatment group more moderately large, large-, and giant-sized (Koos Grades III and IV, 72.3%) than small-and medium-sized tumors (Koos Grade II, 27.7%; no Koos Grade I tumors) were observed. 10 In contrast, the relation of tumor sizes in the control group was 47.9% of Koos Grade I and II and 52.1% of Koos Grade III and IV tumors. Extent of resection was comparable with complete removal in 40 patients in both groups, capsule remnants (1-3 mm) in 4 patients in the treatment group and in 3 patients in the control group, and subtotal removal (3-10 mm) in 3 patients in the therapy group and in 5 patients in the control group, based on the evaluation of axial T1-weighted and contrast-enhanced MR images by a blinded neuroradiologist.…”
Section: Baseline Datamentioning
confidence: 83%
“…In the treatment group more moderately large, large-, and giant-sized (Koos Grades III and IV, 72.3%) than small-and medium-sized tumors (Koos Grade II, 27.7%; no Koos Grade I tumors) were observed. 10 In contrast, the relation of tumor sizes in the control group was 47.9% of Koos Grade I and II and 52.1% of Koos Grade III and IV tumors. Extent of resection was comparable with complete removal in 40 patients in both groups, capsule remnants (1-3 mm) in 4 patients in the treatment group and in 3 patients in the control group, and subtotal removal (3-10 mm) in 3 patients in the therapy group and in 5 patients in the control group, based on the evaluation of axial T1-weighted and contrast-enhanced MR images by a blinded neuroradiologist.…”
Section: Baseline Datamentioning
confidence: 83%
“…35 Hence, in a recent systematic review of large AN series it was shown that in vast majority of articles included (17 out of 19) various linear and not volume measurements techniques were used, including qualitative ANCSRR and Koos tumor size classification systems. 36,37 These systems, despite the fact that have been introduced for many years have not been commonly used since less than 20% of the papers identified had used them. 37 Moreover, even though volumetric measurements have been suggested since 1990s, still are not used in vast majority of relevant studies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…36,37 These systems, despite the fact that have been introduced for many years have not been commonly used since less than 20% of the papers identified had used them. 37 Moreover, even though volumetric measurements have been suggested since 1990s, still are not used in vast majority of relevant studies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We divided patients in five grades according to the extrameatal tumor size (0-10 mm, 11-20 mm, 21-30 mm, 31-40 mm and .40mm) 9 . Surgical results were evaluated based on the extension of resection, tumor relapse, and facial nerve function.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%