2022
DOI: 10.1021/acsomega.2c01189
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

New Application Field of Polyethylene Oxide: PEO Nanofibers as Epoxy Toughener for Effective CFRP Delamination Resistance Improvement

Abstract: Delamination is the most severe weakness affecting all composite materials with a laminar structure. Nanofibrous mat interleaving is a smart way to increase the interlaminar fracture toughness: the use of thermoplastic polymers, such as poly(ε-caprolactone) and polyamides (Nylons), as nonwovens is common and well established. Here, electrospun polyethylene oxide (PEO) nanofibers are proposed as reinforcing layers for hindering delamination in epoxy-based carbon fiber-reinforced polymer (CFRP) laminates. While … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The addition of micro- or nanofillers to polymer materials has been used to achieve the desired mechanical and thermal characteristics [ 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 ]. Nanofiber-reinforced composite laminates can have a higher tensile strength [ 9 ], interlaminar fracture toughness [ 10 , 11 ], resistance to delamination [ 12 , 13 ] under static, impact, and fatigue loads. These characteristics depend on the polymer, chemical, physical, and mechanical parameters, as well as the additives.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The addition of micro- or nanofillers to polymer materials has been used to achieve the desired mechanical and thermal characteristics [ 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 ]. Nanofiber-reinforced composite laminates can have a higher tensile strength [ 9 ], interlaminar fracture toughness [ 10 , 11 ], resistance to delamination [ 12 , 13 ] under static, impact, and fatigue loads. These characteristics depend on the polymer, chemical, physical, and mechanical parameters, as well as the additives.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…8 G,H). Moreover, the flat planes, still reminiscent of brittle matrix fracture, are completely lost, as already observed when the nanomodification is carried out through polyethylene oxide (PEO) 46 , NBR/PCL blend 32 and NBR/Nomex mixed 33 nanofibers. By contrast, such planes are visible when the mats are impregnated by the 3.0 wt% NBR solution, highlighting that the matrix toughening is lower.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…
Figure 7 Comparison of Mode I energy release rate of tested composites with literature data: ( A ) G I initiation, and ( B ) G I propagation. Legend: circles identify the laminates tested in the present work (solid black circle, reference; black circles, plain Nylon 66 mats; blue circles, mats impregnated with the 3.0 wt% NBR solution; red circles, mats impregnated with the 7.0 wt% NBR solution); yellow polyamide nanofibers 26 ; green, NBR/PCL nanofibers 32 ; spent fucsia, NBR/Nomex nanofibers 33 ; dark blue, PEO nanofibers 46 ; grey, “other” nanofiber types 26 .
…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mechanical properties of NFMs were characterized as shown in Figure 5 and Table 3 . The tensile behavior exhibited by the three different NFMs is common, as reported in different literature [ 41 , 42 , 43 ]. It could be seen from Figure 5 that during the stretching process, the beginning of the curve was a straight line, where the elastic deformation was first triggered until the stress exceeded the elastic limit and entered the yielding phase.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 93%