2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpba.2023.115650
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

New approach to rifampicin stability and first-line anti-tubercular drug pharmacokinetics by UPLC-MS/MS

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Analysis of the tested compounds using a validated UPLC-MS/MS method in urine samples from five patients showed that the samples contained RIF-Q and 3-F-RIF ( Table 5 ), suggesting that RIF may be degraded during sample preparation or storage. The concentration of RIF-Q was in the range of 0.71–2.62 µg/mL (average 1.9 ± 0.8 µg/mL), and comprised 3.6–13.2% of the sum of RIF and RIF-Q (almost twice than reported in plasma [ 37 ]). Similarly, 3-F-RIF peak was detected in all samples ( Figure 1 ), and the concentration of the compound was an average of 1.3 ± 1.3 µg/mL ( Table 5 ), while it was previously below LLOQ in plasma [ 37 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Analysis of the tested compounds using a validated UPLC-MS/MS method in urine samples from five patients showed that the samples contained RIF-Q and 3-F-RIF ( Table 5 ), suggesting that RIF may be degraded during sample preparation or storage. The concentration of RIF-Q was in the range of 0.71–2.62 µg/mL (average 1.9 ± 0.8 µg/mL), and comprised 3.6–13.2% of the sum of RIF and RIF-Q (almost twice than reported in plasma [ 37 ]). Similarly, 3-F-RIF peak was detected in all samples ( Figure 1 ), and the concentration of the compound was an average of 1.3 ± 1.3 µg/mL ( Table 5 ), while it was previously below LLOQ in plasma [ 37 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…The concentration of RIF-Q was in the range of 0.71–2.62 µg/mL (average 1.9 ± 0.8 µg/mL), and comprised 3.6–13.2% of the sum of RIF and RIF-Q (almost twice than reported in plasma [ 37 ]). Similarly, 3-F-RIF peak was detected in all samples ( Figure 1 ), and the concentration of the compound was an average of 1.3 ± 1.3 µg/mL ( Table 5 ), while it was previously below LLOQ in plasma [ 37 ]. Given the potential conversion between RIF and RIF-Q and the variations in pH during urine storage, additional research is needed to explore the degradation pathway of RIF.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Bioanalysis of rifampicin may require an adjuvant (ascorbic acid) to prevent degradation, as evidenced by many authors. 15–18 Adequate storage conditions (e.g. −80°C) and timely processing of plasma samples are recommended.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%