2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.fluid.2021.113254
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

New association schemes for tri-ethylene glycol

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
8
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
3
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The thermodynamic modeling of the TEG-CH 4 system indicated that the CPA model was able to reasonably predict the new experimental data, using the parameters established by Derawi et al 9 Regression analysis of the data showed that the best fit was obtained for a temperature-independent binary interaction parameter of k ij = 0.136 ± 0.006. However, a comparable fit was obtained when using the value of 0.1643 established by Qvistgaard et al 16 More experimental data are required to determine the best value in this case and to confirm whether a temperature dependence is justified.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 65%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The thermodynamic modeling of the TEG-CH 4 system indicated that the CPA model was able to reasonably predict the new experimental data, using the parameters established by Derawi et al 9 Regression analysis of the data showed that the best fit was obtained for a temperature-independent binary interaction parameter of k ij = 0.136 ± 0.006. However, a comparable fit was obtained when using the value of 0.1643 established by Qvistgaard et al 16 More experimental data are required to determine the best value in this case and to confirm whether a temperature dependence is justified.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 65%
“…As shown in Table and Figure , the best fit to the current experimental data set utilized a binary interaction parameter of k ij = 0.136 ± 0.006. However, a comparable result could be achieved with the parameter used by Qvistgaard et al . of 0.1643.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 58%
See 3 more Smart Citations