2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcyt.2018.02.315
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

New automated and closed electroporation system that yields cross-presenting Mo-DCs with improved functionality

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For instance, Thermofisher's Neon pipette electroporation system (Schumann et al, 2015), Nepagene's NEPA21 electroporator (Ang et al, 2017;Xiao et al, 2018), Biorad's Gene Pulser (Harrer et al, 2017;Krug et al, 2014;Schaft et al, 2006) and Lonza's Nucleofector (Chicaybam et al, 2013;Nakazawa et al, 2016) have been frequently used in research settings. Towards clinical applications that require higher throughput, dedicated devices have come to the market such as the Maxcyte's ExPERT family of flow-based electroporation systems (Li et al, 2002;Stadtmauer et al, 2020;Zhao et al, 2010), Miltenyi's CliniMACS electroporator (Altmann et al, 2018) and BTX's AgilePulse MAX electroporation system for large sample volumes (Bidmon et al, 2018;Valton et al, 2018). Large volume in-flow electroporation was introduced in 2002 by MaxCyte demonstrating pDNA transfection efficiencies up to 50% in T cells, with cell viabilities of 70% based on flow cytometric quantification using PI staining as a cell death marker (Fig.…”
Section: Membrane Permeabilization-based Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, Thermofisher's Neon pipette electroporation system (Schumann et al, 2015), Nepagene's NEPA21 electroporator (Ang et al, 2017;Xiao et al, 2018), Biorad's Gene Pulser (Harrer et al, 2017;Krug et al, 2014;Schaft et al, 2006) and Lonza's Nucleofector (Chicaybam et al, 2013;Nakazawa et al, 2016) have been frequently used in research settings. Towards clinical applications that require higher throughput, dedicated devices have come to the market such as the Maxcyte's ExPERT family of flow-based electroporation systems (Li et al, 2002;Stadtmauer et al, 2020;Zhao et al, 2010), Miltenyi's CliniMACS electroporator (Altmann et al, 2018) and BTX's AgilePulse MAX electroporation system for large sample volumes (Bidmon et al, 2018;Valton et al, 2018). Large volume in-flow electroporation was introduced in 2002 by MaxCyte demonstrating pDNA transfection efficiencies up to 50% in T cells, with cell viabilities of 70% based on flow cytometric quantification using PI staining as a cell death marker (Fig.…”
Section: Membrane Permeabilization-based Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%