1998
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1096-8628(19981204)80:4<429::aid-ajmg24>3.0.co;2-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

New autosomal recessive syndrome of severe microcephaly and skeletal anomalies including posterior rib-gap defects

Abstract: We describe two female fetuses conceived by a nonconsanguineous couple. The pregnancies were interrupted at 31 and 26 weeks of gestation, respectively, because of severe microcephaly. Postmortem X-ray and autopsy studies showed in both fetuses: 1) severe intrauterine growth retardation; 2) facial anomalies characterized by severe microcephaly, sloping forehead, low set and posteriorly angulated ears, prominent eyes, down-slanting palpebral fissures, large nose, small mouth with full lips, and mild microretrogn… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0
1

Year Published

2002
2002
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
1
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Although numerous cases of CCMS have been reported in literature, our patient was unique in manifesting a complete absence of ossification of the ribs. Fetal growth restriction has not been commonly described as a feature of this syndrome, although some patients with CCMS have been associated with severe intrauterine growth restriction [2]. Fetal growth restriction of our patient may be part of CCMS, although a minor role of the placenta cannot be entirely excluded.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…Although numerous cases of CCMS have been reported in literature, our patient was unique in manifesting a complete absence of ossification of the ribs. Fetal growth restriction has not been commonly described as a feature of this syndrome, although some patients with CCMS have been associated with severe intrauterine growth restriction [2]. Fetal growth restriction of our patient may be part of CCMS, although a minor role of the placenta cannot be entirely excluded.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…Included (Abdalla et al, 2011;Bacrot et al, 2015;Beluffi et al, 2001;Bhat et al, 2020;Burton & Oestreich, 1988;Casas Gomez et al, 1996;Clarke & Nguyen, 1985;Cohnen et al, 1999;Drossou-Agakidou et al, 1991;Duval et al, 1998;Ech-Cherif El Kettani & Dafiri, 2004;Faure et al, 1978;Flodmark & Wattsgard, 2001;Frulio et al, 2007;Gurgey et al, 1985;Hanicka, 1979;Harris & Fellows, 1977;Hegde et al, 2011;Herman & Siegel, 1996;Hosalkar et al, 2000;James & Aftimos, 2003;Kemperdick & Lemburg, 1976;Kirk & Ades, 1998;Kringelbach & Henriksen, 1968;Kuhn et al, 1975;Langer Jr. & Herrmann, 1974;Leroy et al, 1981;Lim & Koh, 1992;Lynch et al, 2014;Matic et al, 2016;McNicholl et al, 1970;Meinecke et al, 1987;Merlob et al, 1987;Miller et al, 1972;Mohan & Mandalam, 1982;Mota et al, 2000;Nagasawa et al, 2010;Nicholls & Fletcher, 1973;Oestreich & Stanek, 2010;Ogasawara et al, 2014;Ogita et al, 20...…”
Section: Included or Excluded Referencesunclassified