New avenues in research on musculoskeletal disorders

Abstract

Viikari-Juntura E, Riihimaki H. New avenues in research on musculoskeletal disorders. Scand J Work Environ Health 1999;25(6, special issue):564-568. Recent reviews on musculoskeletal disorders have clearly pointed out the need for more good-quality original research. Both symptom-based and objective outcome assessment methods should be improved. A variety of methods exists to assess exposure for short-term outcomes, whereas exposure assessment strategies for outcomes with long induction times should be developed. The change in exposure patterns -less force demands, more static, visual, cognitive, psychological and social load -will continue during the next millennium, and a likely result is a change in the disease panorama. The pathomechanisms of the effects of low-level static contractions and adverse psychosocial conditions need clarification. Genetic epidemiology is an emerging field of research, and it will be particularly interesting to study the interaction between genetically determined susceptibility and occupational risk factors. Because degeneration of the spine starts in adolescence, the importance of studying the etiology of degenerative disorders among young populations is emphasized.Key terms assessment of outcome, exposure assessment, genetic epidemiology, low back, psychological factors,

Work-related musculoskeletal disorders: the epidemiologic evidence and the debate

“…The limitations of available diagnostic technologies for MSDs have been discussed by others [41,85]. Diagnostic criteria are not standardized and are often inconsistent from one examiner to another, even though there are consensus documents for several upper extremity MSDs [28,62,75].…”

Risk factors for neck-shoulder and wrist-hand symptoms in a 5-year follow-up study of 3,990 employees in Denmark

“…The role of the psychosocial factors at work has been much debated (Bongers et al 1993;Viikari-Juntura and Riihima¨ki 1999), and the role of psychosocial factors in childhood has also been the object of research (Viikari-Juntura et al 1991). However, many studies have focused either on physical factors, with little or no effort to quantify psychosocial exposures, or on psychosocial factors, without adjusting for physical exposures.…”

Exploring perceived tension as a response to psychosocial work stress

“…It is suggested that new research paradigms are needed to study dynamic processes associated with these factors (40,41). The monitoring of tension can be a useful intermediate response variable in this respect.…”