2013
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2393-13-38
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

New birth weight reference standards customised to birth order and sex of babies from South India

Abstract: BackgroundThe foetal growth standards for Indian children which are available today suffer due to methodological problems. These are, for example, not adhering to the WHO recommendation to base gestational age on the number of completed weeks and secondly, not excluding mothers with risk factors. This study has addressed both the above issues and in addition provides birthweight reference ranges with regard to sex of the baby and maternal parity.MethodsData from the labour room register from 1996 to 2010 was o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
38
0
3

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
3
38
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…To understand the factors causing LBW, many studies demonstrated association of LBW with various factors, such as, biological (Amory et al, ; Monden & Smits, ; Prasad & Al‐Taher, ), demographic (deKeyser et al, ; Gebremariam, ; Tema, ), nutritional (Black et al, ; Frederick, Williams, Sales, Martin, & Killien, ; Kumar et al, ; Rao et al, ; Schieve et al, ; Zhu, Rolfs, Nangle, & Horan, ), or socio‐economic (Elshibly & Schmalisch, ; Mumbare et al, ; Ohlsson & Shah, ), in different regions of the world.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To understand the factors causing LBW, many studies demonstrated association of LBW with various factors, such as, biological (Amory et al, ; Monden & Smits, ; Prasad & Al‐Taher, ), demographic (deKeyser et al, ; Gebremariam, ; Tema, ), nutritional (Black et al, ; Frederick, Williams, Sales, Martin, & Killien, ; Kumar et al, ; Rao et al, ; Schieve et al, ; Zhu, Rolfs, Nangle, & Horan, ), or socio‐economic (Elshibly & Schmalisch, ; Mumbare et al, ; Ohlsson & Shah, ), in different regions of the world.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, a study from North India reported a mean birth weight of 2725.40±424.64g, mean gestation of 38.1±1.9 (SD) weeks and LBW of 19.8 % in 2010 12 . Another study from South India reported a mean birthweight of 2846g in the year 1996 and 2907g in 2010 (15 years later) a difference of 61 grams in the mean birthweights over one and a half decades 13 . In contrast, western populations report a high mean birth weight of 3446g in U.S. born white women, a difference of 573g compared to the 2015-2017 study 14 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Joshi et al 4 did a retrospective study in Bhopal in 2012 with 441 newborns and found that the mean weight was 2.72 ± 0.41 kg. A recent study in South India by Kumar et al 6 reported that the mean BW were 2.934 kg and 2.889 kg respectively in males and females. The male babies of term firstborn were found to be 45 g heavier than female babies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%