“…Still, due to their cryptic ecology, it is not surprising that the majority of recent genus and species descriptions are based on the investigation of a few individuals only ( e.g ., Conway et al ., 2017b). Whereas some of these taxonomical and systematic studies use more classical approaches ( e.g ., Fricke, 2014; Fricke et al ., 2010, 2015; Fricke & Wirtz, 2017, 2018; Sparks & Gruber, 2012), many authors include more comprehensive morphological ( e.g ., micro‐computed tomography imaging) and/or genetic ( e.g ., single locus DNA barcoding) methods, which altogether turn out to be effective tools for delineating clingfish species ( e.g ., Almada et al ., 2008; Bilecenoğlu et al ., 2017; Conway et al ., 2014, 2017a–c, 2018, 2019; Fricke et al ., 2017; Fujiwara et al ., 2018; Fujiwara & Motomura, 2018a,b, 2019, 2020; Henriques et al ., 2002).…”