“…In this framework, Gao et al [22,23] reported that CeO 2 -TiO 2 xerogel catalyst, elaborated via sol-gel method, exhibits much better NH 3 -SCR performance than the same catalysts prepared by impregnation and co-precipitation methods, owing to its high surface area, better redox ability, strong interaction between CeO 2 and TiO 2 and well dispersed CeO 2 species. On the other hand, many literature reports have proved that adding acidic components (sulfuric acid [24], phosphoric acid [25]; oxides of: W [26], Mo [27] or Nb [28]) into Ce based catalysts enhances its acidic functions and thereby improves significantly its NO-NO-SCR activity. Yu et al [29], investigated a series of sulfated catalysts (CuSO 4 /TiO 2 , Fe 2 (SO 4 ) 3 /TiO 2 , MnSO 4 /TiO 2 , Ce(SO 4 ) 2 /TiO 2 and CoSO 4 /TiO 2 ) in the NH 3 -SCR reaction and demonstrated that the amount of acid sites was the main factor which affects the catalytic activity of metal sulfate catalysts.…”