2012
DOI: 10.1007/s10142-012-0283-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

New cis-regulatory elements in the Rht-D1b locus region of wheat

Abstract: Fifteen gene-containing BACs with accumulated length of 1.82-Mb from the Rht-D1b locus region were sequenced and compared in detail with the orthologous regions of rice, sorghum, and maize. Our results show that Rht-D1b represents a conserved genomic region as implied by high gene sequence identity, good maintenance of gene colinearity, and the presence of multiple conserved noncoding sequences (CNSs) that are shared by other grass species. Eight cis-regulatory elements in these CNSs around grass DELLA genes w… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The majority of the predicted amino acid sequences such as the C-terminal domain were highly conserved among these species with slightly variable lengths. Furthermore, we detected a CNS shared by all the surveyed grasses, which is in accordance with previous report [35]. …”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The majority of the predicted amino acid sequences such as the C-terminal domain were highly conserved among these species with slightly variable lengths. Furthermore, we detected a CNS shared by all the surveyed grasses, which is in accordance with previous report [35]. …”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 93%
“…The conservation of different CNSs could vary among plant species. The CNSs conserved among all the plant species, can be named as inter plant genome CNSs, while the CNSs conserved among the grass species can be regarded as inter grass genome CNSs [35,39]. The three CNSs reported in present study were conserved only among the three wheat subgenomes, so they were named as inter subgenome CNSs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…Our capture assay does not include repetitive regions so we could not precisely establish the borders of the deleted region. However, we were able to determine that this deletion occurs in a chromosomal region that is highly conserved among several Poaceae species (Duan et al 2012 ; Wilhelm et al 2013a ) and harbors at least nine annotated genes including wheat orthologs of TEOSINTE BRANCHED1 ( TB1 , TraesCS4B01G042700), a C3HC4-Type RING Finger (TraesCS4B01G042900) and Rht-B1 (TraesCS4B01G043100, Table 2 ). To identify which of these genes is causative for the increased height phenotype, it will be necessary to characterize independent knockout mutants for each of the deleted genes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A comparison to variants in Lolium perenne (Asp et al 2011) showed that INDELS in several different locations within intron 1 could modify Vrn1 expression. Additional examples include the identification of the bract suppression gene Trd1 , a GATA transcription factor, on barley 1H through fine mapping and anchoring of the phenotype to a syntenic region in rice (Houston et al 2012), the boron toxicity tolerance gene on barley 4H (Sutton et al 2007), the Rht-D1 gene region on 4D (Duan et al 2012), and the NAC transcription factor on wheat 6B (Distelfeld et al 2004, 2012). In the case of the NAC transcription factor, the functional attributes appeared to be quite different in rice and wheat (Distelfeld et al 2012) and indicated extrapolating function based on shared DNA sequence structure may not always be possible.…”
Section: Comparative Genomics Reveals Unique Features Of the Triticeamentioning
confidence: 99%