2022
DOI: 10.1002/jmri.28226
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

New Cluster Analysis Method for Quantitative Dynamic Contrast‐Enhanced MRI Assessing Tumor Heterogeneity Induced by a Tumor‐Microenvironmental Ameliorator (E7130) Treatment to a Breast Cancer Mouse Model

Abstract: Background: Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) can provide insight into tumor perfusion. However, a method that can quantitatively measure the intra-tumor distribution of tumor voxel clusters with a distinct range of K trans and v e values remains insufficiently explored. Hypothesis: Two-dimensional cluster analysis may quantify the distribution of a tumor voxel subregion with a distinct range of K trans and v e values in human breast cancer xenografts. Study Type: Prospective longi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 40 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This analysis began with conversion of the time-dependent pixel intensity, S ( t ), to relaxation rate, R 1 (t) = 1/ T 1 (t), using the relation where TR is the repetition time, S 0 is the signal intensity prior to the bolus arrival, α is the flip angle used to acquire the dynamic data, and where and T 10 is the pre-contrast longitudinal relaxation time determined in the VFA experiment. The relaxation rates were then converted to contrast agent concentrations using the relation where r 1 = 4.6 s −1 mm −1 [ 36 ] is the relaxivity of the contrast agent in the tissue. Non-linear least-squares analysis was then used to fit the tissue concentration curves to the relation [ 22 ] where we have introduced the sub-script notation to indicate parameters associated with the tissue of interest (TOI) and reference region (RR), and are the adjustable parameters and values for the reference tissue parameters in muscle were assumed to be = 0.1 min −1 and = 0.1 [ 22 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This analysis began with conversion of the time-dependent pixel intensity, S ( t ), to relaxation rate, R 1 (t) = 1/ T 1 (t), using the relation where TR is the repetition time, S 0 is the signal intensity prior to the bolus arrival, α is the flip angle used to acquire the dynamic data, and where and T 10 is the pre-contrast longitudinal relaxation time determined in the VFA experiment. The relaxation rates were then converted to contrast agent concentrations using the relation where r 1 = 4.6 s −1 mm −1 [ 36 ] is the relaxivity of the contrast agent in the tissue. Non-linear least-squares analysis was then used to fit the tissue concentration curves to the relation [ 22 ] where we have introduced the sub-script notation to indicate parameters associated with the tissue of interest (TOI) and reference region (RR), and are the adjustable parameters and values for the reference tissue parameters in muscle were assumed to be = 0.1 min −1 and = 0.1 [ 22 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%